ReviewBiomedical engineering letters2020
Biomechanics of infarcted left ventricle: a review of modelling.
Review in Biomedical engineering letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Left Ventricular Remodeling After Myocardial Infarction-Pathophysiology, Diagnostic Approach and Management During Cardiac Rehabilitation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Cardiomyocyte Alpha-1A Adrenergic Receptors Mitigate Postinfarct Remodeling and Mortality by Constraining Necroptosis.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2024Article
- Case Report: A left ventricular pseudoaneurysm detected by cardiac magnetic resonance more than 1 year after a percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Advancing clinical translation of cardiac biomechanics models: a comprehensive review, applications and future pathways.Frontiers in physics · 2023Article
- Collagen matricryptin promotes cardiac function by mediating scar formation.Life sciences · 2023Article
- Fourier analysis of collagen bundle orientation in myocardial infarction scars.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2022Article
- Patient-Specific Modelling and Parameter Optimisation to Simulate Dilated Cardiomyopathy in Children.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2022Article
- Optimal Position of Attachment for Removable Thermoplastic Aligner on the Lower Canine Using Finite Element Analysis.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mathematical modelling in biomechanics of infarcted left ventricle (LV) serves as an indispensable tool for remodelling mechanism exploration, LV biomechanical property estimation and therapy assessment after myocardial infarction (MI). However, a review of mathematical modelling after MI has not been seen in the literature so far. In the paper, a systematic review of mathematical models in biomechanics of infarcted LV was established. The models include comprehensive cardiovascular system model, essential LV pressure-volume and stress-stretch models, constitutive laws for passive myocardium and scars, tension models for active myocardium, collagen fibre orientation optimization models, fibroblast and collagen fibre growth/degradation models and integrated growth-electro-mechanical model after MI. The primary idea, unique characteristics and key equations of each model were identified and extracted. Discussions on the models were provided and followed research issues on them were addressed. Considerable improvements in the cardiovascular system model, LV aneurysm model, coupled agent-based models and integrated electro-mechanical-growth LV model are encouraged. Substantial attention should be paid to new constitutive laws with respect to stress-stretch curve and strain energy function for infarcted passive myocardium, collagen fibre orientation optimization in scar, cardiac rupture and tissue damage and viscoelastic effect post-MI in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.