Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32864864›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2020

Development and implementation of blood pressure screening and referral guidelines for German community pharmacists.

Martin Schulz, Nina Griese-Mammen, Pia M Schumacher, Dorothea Strauch, Leonard Freudewald, André Said, Ross T Tsuyuki, Ulrich Laufs, Ulrich Kintscher, Michael Böhm and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Hypertension care: the knowledge and attitudes of the community pharmacists.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Martin SchulzDrug Commission of German Pharmacists, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5876-7322
Nina Griese-MammenDepartment of Medicine, ABDA - Federal Union of German Associations of Pharmacists, Berlin, Germany.
Pia M SchumacherDepartment of Medicine, ABDA - Federal Union of German Associations of Pharmacists, Berlin, Germany.
Dorothea StrauchDepartment of Medicine, ABDA - Federal Union of German Associations of Pharmacists, Berlin, Germany.
Leonard FreudewaldDrug Commission of German Pharmacists, Berlin, Germany.
André SaidDrug Commission of German Pharmacists, Berlin, Germany.
Ross T TsuyukiDivision of Cardiology and Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3724-598X
Ulrich LaufsDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Ulrich KintscherInstitute for Pharmacology, Center for Cardiovascular Research, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Michael BöhmInternal Medicine III - Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Saarland, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Felix MahfoudInternal Medicine III - Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Saarland, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Federal Union of German Associations of Pharmacists · DESaarland University · DEGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DEUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DEUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Involvement of community pharmacists in the detection and control of hypertension improves patient care. However, current European or North-American guidelines do not provide specific guidance how to implement collaboration between pharmacists and physicians, especially when and how to refer patients with undetected or uncontrolled hypertension to a physician. The German Society of Cardiology and the ABDA - Federal Union of German Associations of Pharmacists developed and tested referral recommendations for community pharmacists, embedded in two guideline worksheets. The project included a guideline-directed blood pressure (BP) measurement and recommendations when patients should be referred to their physician. A "red flag" referral within 4 weeks was recommended when SBP was >140 mm Hg or DBP >90 mm Hg (for subjects <80 years), and >160 mm Hg or >90 mm Hg (≥80 years) in undetected individuals, or >130 mm Hg or >80 mm Hg (<65 years) and >140 mm Hg or >80 mm Hg (≥65 years) in treated patients. BP was measured in 187 individuals (86 with known hypertension, mean [±SD] age 62 ± 15 years, 64% female, and 101 without known hypertension, 47 ± 16 years, 75% female) from 17 community pharmacies. In patients with hypertension, poorly controlled BP was detected in 55% (n = 47) and were referred. A total of 16/101 subjects without a history of hypertension were referred to their physician because of uncontrolled BP. Structured BP testing in pharmacies identified a significant number of subjects with undetected/undiagnosed hypertension and patients with poorly controlled BP. Community pharmacists could play a significant role in collaboration with physicians to improve the management of hypertension.

Indexed as

Community Pharmacy ServicesHypertensionPharmacistsReferral and ConsultationAdultAgedAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicAntihypertensive Agentsblood pressure controlcommunity pharmacy serviceguidelineshypertensionscreening

Identifiers

PMID32864864
PMCPMC8029717
OpenAlexW3082745849

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.