Evidence mapPaperPMID 32880876Full record

ArticleDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2020

The Real-World Observational Prospective Study of Health Outcomes with Dulaglutide and Liraglutide in Type 2 Diabetes Patients (TROPHIES): Baseline Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Kristina S Boye, Hélène Sapin, Luis-Emilio García-Pérez, Myriam Rosilio, Marco Orsini Federici, Elke Heitmann, Heike Jung, Ulrich Aigner, Bruno Guerci, Francesco Giorgino and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Kristina S BoyeEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA. boye_kristina_secnik@lilly.com.
Hélène SapinLilly France SAS, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.
Luis-Emilio García-PérezLilly S.A., Alcobendas, Madrid, Spain.
Myriam RosilioLilly France SAS, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.
Marco Orsini FedericiEli Lilly and Company, Sesto Fiorentino, FI, Italy.
Elke HeitmannLilly Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany.
Heike JungLilly Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany.
Ulrich AignerVersdias GmbH, Sulzbach-Rosenberg, Germany.
Bruno GuerciUniversity Hospital of Nancy, Vandoeuvre Lès Nancy, France.
Francesco GiorginoUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Kirsi NorrbackaEli Lilly and Company, Helsinki, Finland.
Eli Lilly (Germany) · DECentre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy · FREli Lilly (Italy) · ITEli Lilly (United States) · USUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures provide important information beyond clinical data, studies that assess the PROs of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients initiating injectable glucose-lowering medications in routine clinical practice are limited. We describe the perspectives of patients based on a diversified panel of generic and disease-specific PRO measures at the time of enrollment (baseline) in the TROPHIES study.

methodsTROPHIES is a 24-month prospective observational study performed in France, Germany, and Italy in patients with T2DM who initiated their first injectable glucose-lowering medication with once-weekly dulaglutide or once-daily liraglutide. To better understand the perspectives of these patients regarding their overall health, treatment satisfaction, and quality of life and work, the patients' responses to the following questionnaires were collected at baseline before they initiated treatment with dulaglutide or liraglutide: EQ-5D-5L (scale: 0-1), EQ-VAS (visual analog scale: 0-100), Impact of Weight on Self-Perceptions Questionnaire (IW-SP; scale: 0-100), Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire Status (DTSQs; scale: 0-36), and Diabetes Productivity Measure (DPM; scale: 0-100). Analyses were descriptive in nature, with higher scores reflecting better outcomes.

resultsData from patients at the time of enrollment were analyzed. At baseline, patients initiating dulaglutide (N = 1130) or liraglutide (N = 1051) rated their quality of life in terms of mean EQ-5D-5L index as 0.84 and 0.83, and in terms of mean EQ-VAS as 67.5 and 67.5, respectively. The mean baseline scores in patients initiating dulaglutide or liraglutide were 59.8 and 61.3 for IW-SP, 24.6 and 25.8 for DTSQs, 78.6 and 79.5 for DPM Life Productivity, and 87.5 and 86.8 for DPM Work Productivity, respectively.

conclusionThe information from this varied panel of PRO instruments collected at baseline complements clinical outcomes data.

Indexed as

DulaglutideGlucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonistsLiraglutidePatient-reported outcomesReal-world studyType 2 diabetes patients

Identifiers

PMID32880876
PMCPMC7509014
OpenAlexW3083764333

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.