Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32892548›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2021

Clinicopathological characteristics and mutational profile of KRAS and NRAS in Tunisian patients with sporadic colorectal cancer

Donia Ounissi, Marwa Weslati, Rahma Boughriba, Meriam Hazgui, Saadia Bouraoui

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. International journal of general medicine · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Donia OunissiLaboratory of Colorectal Cancer Research UR12SP14, Mongi Slim Hospital, La Marsa, TunisiaORCID 0000-0003-4585-271X
Marwa WeslatiLaboratory of Colorectal Cancer Research UR12SP14, Mongi Slim Hospital, La Marsa, TunisiaORCID 0000-0001-5641-8754
Rahma BoughribaLaboratory of Colorectal Cancer Research UR12SP14, Mongi Slim Hospital, La Marsa, TunisiaORCID 0000-0002-6824-8307
Meriam HazguiLaboratory of Colorectal Cancer Research UR12SP14, Mongi Slim Hospital, La Marsa, TunisiaORCID 0000-0003-2195-6469
Saadia BouraouiLaboratory of Colorectal Cancer Research UR12SP14, Mongi Slim Hospital, La Marsa, TunisiaORCID 0000-0002-9456-6878
Hôpital Mongi Slim · TNTunis El Manar University · TNTunis University · TN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/aim: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major public health problem worldwide and in Tunisia due to its increasing rate of incidence. KRAS and NRAS mutations have become a pivotal part of CRC diagnosis, given their association to treatment resistance with antiepidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies. In this study, we aimed to screen for mutations in KRAS and NRAS genes in Tunisian patients with CRC and explore their correlations with clinicopathological features. Materials and methods: AmoyDx KRAS and NRAS mutation real-time PCR kits were used to screen for mutations in KRAS (exon 2) and NRAS (exons 2, 3, and 4) in 96 CRC tumors. Results: KRAS exon 2 mutations were found in 41.7% (40/96) of the patients. Codon 12’s most abundant mutations were G12D and G12V, followed by G12A, while G13D is the predominant mutation in codon 13. KRAS exon 2 mutations were associated with older patients (P = 0.029), left-sided tumors (P = 0.037), and greater differentiation (P = 0.044). The prevalence rate of NRAS mutations was 7.3%, mostly in exon 2. These mutations were associated with early stages of the disease (P = 0.039) and the absence of lymph node metastasis (P = 0.045). Conclusion: It can be inferred from this study that Tunisian CRC patients have a similar frequency of KRAS and NRAS mutations compared to those observed in other populations. Consequently, screening for KRAS and NRAS mutations is crucial for the orientation of therapies and the selection of appropriate candidates, while also helping to avoid unnecessary toxicity and increased costs for patients.

Indexed as

MutationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, MonoclonalCodonColorectal NeoplasmsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmExonsFemaleGTP PhosphohydrolasesHumansMaleMembrane ProteinsMiddle AgedProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Antibodies, MonoclonalCodonGTP PhosphohydrolasesKRAS protein, humanMembrane ProteinsNRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)ARMS-PCRKRASNRASreal-time PCRSporadic colorectal cancerTunisia

Identifiers

PMID32892548
PMCPMC7991861
OpenAlexW3084415647

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.