ArticleTrends in molecular medicine2020
Huntington's Disease: Les Jeux Sont Faits?
Article in Trends in molecular medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Developmental Alterations in Adult-Onset Neurodegenerative Disorders: Lessons from Polyglutamine Diseases.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In a meticulous study, Humbert, Durr, and colleagues showed evidence for aberrant neurodevelopment in both Huntington's disease (HD) and mouse models of HD. We consider the implications of prenatal pathological changes for the onset and progression of HD and their relatedness to current therapeutic plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32893090What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.