Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32899378›Full record

ArticleViruses2020

Diagnostic Challenges in Canine Parvovirus 2c in Vaccine Failure Cases.

Hiu Ying Esther Yip, Anne Peaston, Lucy Woolford, Shiow Jing Khuu, Georgia Wallace, Rohan Suresh Kumar, Kandarp Patel, Ania Ahani Azari, Malihe Akbarzadeh, Maryam Sharifian and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. In silico designing of multi-epitope vaccine against canine parvovirus using reverse vaccinology.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. The Changes in Canine Parvovirus Variants over the Years.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hiu Ying Esther YipSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy Campus 5371, Australia.
Anne PeastonSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy Campus 5371, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7501-2415
Lucy WoolfordSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy Campus 5371, Australia.
Shiow Jing KhuuSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy Campus 5371, Australia.
Georgia WallaceSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy Campus 5371, Australia.
Rohan Suresh KumarSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy Campus 5371, Australia.
Kandarp PatelSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy Campus 5371, Australia.
Ania Ahani AzariDepartment of Microbiology, Gorgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan 4914739975, Iran.
Malihe AkbarzadehFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shiraz University, Shiraz 69155-71441, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-1274-3878
Maryam SharifianSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy Campus 5371, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6574-8587
Reza AmanollahiFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shiraz University, Shiraz 69155-71441, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-6960-7703
Razi Jafari JozaniSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy Campus 5371, Australia.
Aliakbar KhabiriSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy Campus 5371, Australia.
Farhid HemmatzadehSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy Campus 5371, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4572-8869
The University of Adelaide · AUShiraz University · IRIslamic Azad University of Gorgan · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, three different diagnostic tests for parvovirus were compared with vaccination status and parvovirus genotype in suspected canine parvovirus cases. Faecal samples from vaccinated (N17) and unvaccinated or unknown vaccination status (N41) dogs that had clinical signs of parvovirus infection were tested using three different assays of antigen tests, conventional and quantitative PCR tests. The genotype of each sample was determined by sequencing. In addition to the suspected parvovirus samples, 21 faecal samples from apparently healthy dogs were tested in three diagnostic tests to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the tests. The antigen test was positive in 41.2% of vaccinated dogs and 73.2% of unvaccinated diseased dogs. Conventional PCR and qPCR were positive for canine parvovirus (CPV) in 82.4% of vaccinated dogs and 92.7% of unvaccinated dogs. CPV type-2c (CPV-2c) was detected in 82.75% of dogs (12 vaccinated and 36 unvaccinated dogs), CPV-2b was detected in 5.17% dogs (one vaccinated and two unvaccinated) and CPV-2a in 1.72% vaccinated dog. Mean

Indexed as

AnimalsDog DiseasesDogsFecesGenotypeParvoviridae InfectionsParvovirus, CaninePolymerase Chain ReactionVaccinationViral VaccinesViral Vaccinesantigen rapid CPV/CCV testsBayesian latent class analysisCanine Parvovirus Type 2cqPCRtest sensitivitytest specificityVaccine failure

Identifiers

PMID32899378
PMCPMC7552027
OpenAlexW3081703344

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.