Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32899740›Full record

ReviewGenes2020

An Overview of Duplicated Gene Detection Methods: Why the Duplication Mechanism Has to Be Accounted for in Their Choice.

Tanguy Lallemand, Martin Leduc, Claudine Landès, Carène Rizzon, Emmanuelle Lerat

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 138 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genome-Wide Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Genome-Wide Analysis ofFood science & nutrition · 2026
    Article
  10. Trunk Muscle Differentiation and Growth in Vertebrates.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tanguy LallemandIRHS, Agrocampus-Ouest, INRAE, Université d'Angers, SFR 4207 QuaSaV, 49071 Beaucouzé, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5265-6827
Martin LeducIRHS, Agrocampus-Ouest, INRAE, Université d'Angers, SFR 4207 QuaSaV, 49071 Beaucouzé, France.
Claudine LandèsIRHS, Agrocampus-Ouest, INRAE, Université d'Angers, SFR 4207 QuaSaV, 49071 Beaucouzé, France.
Carène RizzonLaboratoire de Mathématiques et Modélisation d'Evry (LaMME), Université d'Evry Val d'Essonne, Université Paris-Saclay, UMR CNRS 8071, ENSIIE, USC INRAE, 23 bvd de France, CEDEX, 91037 Evry Paris, France.
Emmanuelle LeratUniversité de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive UMR 5558, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6757-8796
Institut Agro Rennes-Angers · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene duplication is an important evolutionary mechanism allowing to provide new genetic material and thus opportunities to acquire new gene functions for an organism, with major implications such as speciation events. Various processes are known to allow a gene to be duplicated and different models explain how duplicated genes can be maintained in genomes. Due to their particular importance, the identification of duplicated genes is essential when studying genome evolution but it can still be a challenge due to the various fates duplicated genes can encounter. In this review, we first describe the evolutionary processes allowing the formation of duplicated genes but also describe the various bioinformatic approaches that can be used to identify them in genome sequences. Indeed, these bioinformatic approaches differ according to the underlying duplication mechanism. Hence, understanding the specificity of the duplicated genes of interest is a great asset for tool selection and should be taken into account when exploring a biological question.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene DuplicationGenes, DuplicateGenomeSelection, GeneticAnimalsChromosome MappingHumansPhylogenybioinformatic toolsgene duplicationgenome evolutionparalogous genessynteny

Identifiers

PMID32899740
PMCPMC7565063
OpenAlexW3083715203

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.