Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32903964›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2020

Impact of Functional Status on Outcomes of Simultaneous Pancreas-kidney Transplantation: Risks and Opportunities for Patient Benefit.

Krista L Lentine, Tarek Alhamad, Wisit Cheungpasitporn, Jane C Tan, Su-Hsin Chang, Matthew Cooper, Darshana M Dadhania, David A Axelrod, Mark A Schnitzler, Rosemary Ouseph and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Generating strategies for a national comeback in pancreas transplantation: A Delphi survey and US conference report.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Krista L LentineSaint Louis University Center for Abdominal Transplantation, St Louis, MO.
Tarek AlhamadWashington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO.
Wisit CheungpasitpornUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS.
Jane C TanStanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
Su-Hsin ChangWashington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO.
Matthew CooperMedstar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Washington, DC.
Darshana M DadhaniaWeill Cornell Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY.
David A AxelrodUniversity of Iowa, Iowa City, MO.
Mark A SchnitzlerSaint Louis University Center for Abdominal Transplantation, St Louis, MO.
Rosemary OusephSaint Louis University Center for Abdominal Transplantation, St Louis, MO.
Franco H Cabeza RiveraUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS.
Bertram L KasiskeHennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN.
Kenneth J WoodsideUniversity Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Ronald F ParsonsEmory University, Atlanta, GA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe impact of functional status on survival among simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPKT) candidates and recipients is not well described.

methodsWe examined national Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) data for patients listed for SPKT in the United States (2006-2019). Functional status was categorized by center-reported Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS). We used Cox regression to quantify associations of KPS at listing and transplant with subsequent patient survival, adjusted for baseline patient and transplant factors (adjusted hazard ratio,

resultsKPS distributions among candidates (N = 16 822) and recipients (N = 10 316), respectively, were normal (KPS 80-100), 62.0% and 57.8%; capable of self-care (KPS 70), 23.5% and 24.7%; requires assistance (KPS 50-60), 12.4% and 14.2%; and disabled (KPS 10-40), 2.1% and 3.3%. There was a graded increase in mortality after listing and after transplant with lower functional levels. Compared with normal functioning, mortality after SPKT rose progressively for patients capable of self-care (aHR,

conclusionsWhile lower functional status is associated with increased mortality risk among SPKT candidates and recipients, SPKT can provide long-term survival benefit across functional status levels in those selected for transplant.

Identifiers

PMID32903964
PMCPMC7447442

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.