Evidence mapPaperPMID 32913634Full record

ReviewF1000Research2020

Management strategies for the treatment and prevention of postoperative/postdischarge nausea and vomiting: an updated review.

Ofelia Loani Elvir-Lazo, Paul F White, Roya Yumul, Hillenn Cruz Eng

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 73 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06022705 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Effect of APFEL Risk Score and Fasting Periods on Postoperative Nausea and/or Vomiting

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorCukurova UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled321ConditionsNausea, Postoperative, Vomiting, Postoperative, APFEL RİSK SCORE
NCT06300346 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparison Between Propofol, Ondansetron and Pregabalin for Control of Emetic Attacks During Caesarean Delivery With Spinal Anesthesia: Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSohag UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled90ConditionsEmetic Attacks During Caesarean Delivery With Spinal AnesthesiaArmsPropofol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 143 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ofelia Loani Elvir-LazoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2825-5182
Paul F WhiteDepartment of Anesthesiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2825-5182
Roya YumulDepartment of Anesthesiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Hillenn Cruz EngDepartment of Anesthesiology, PennState Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA.
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · USPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and postdischarge nausea and vomiting (PDNV) remain common and distressing complications following surgery. The routine use of opioid analgesics for perioperative pain management is a major contributing factor to both PONV and PDNV after surgery. PONV and PDNV can delay discharge from the hospital or surgicenter, delay the return to normal activities of daily living after discharge home, and increase medical costs. The high incidence of PONV and PDNV has persisted despite the introduction of many new antiemetic drugs (and more aggressive use of antiemetic prophylaxis) over the last two decades as a result of growth in minimally invasive ambulatory surgery and the increased emphasis on earlier mobilization and discharge after both minor and major surgical procedures (e.g. enhanced recovery protocols). Pharmacologic management of PONV should be tailored to the patient's risk level using the validated PONV and PDNV risk-scoring systems to encourage cost-effective practices and minimize the potential for adverse side effects due to drug interactions in the perioperative period. A combination of prophylactic antiemetic drugs with different mechanisms of action should be administered to patients with moderate to high risk of developing PONV. In addition to utilizing prophylactic antiemetic drugs, the management of perioperative pain using opioid-sparing multimodal analgesic techniques is critically important for achieving an enhanced recovery after surgery. In conclusion, the utilization of strategies to reduce the baseline risk of PONV (e.g. adequate hydration and the use of nonpharmacologic antiemetic and opioid-sparing analgesic techniques) and implementing multimodal antiemetic and analgesic regimens will reduce the likelihood of patients developing PONV and PDNV after surgery.

Indexed as

Postoperative Nausea and VomitingActivities of Daily LivingAftercareAntiemeticsHumansPatient DischargeAntiemeticsAntiemetic drugsAromatherapyMultimodal antiemetic therapyNeiguan point (PC6).Non-pharmacologic antiemetic therapiesPostdischarge nausea and vomiting (PDNV)Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV)Retching

Identifiers

PMID32913634
PMCPMC7429924
OpenAlexW3048464088

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.