Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32922136›Full record

ArticleSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society2020

Prevalence and severity of dyspepsia in Saudi Arabia: A survey-based study.

Abdulrahman Alwhaibi, Sultan Alghadeer, Salmeen Bablghaith, Syed Wajid, Ziyad Alrabiah, Abdulaziz Alhossan, Mohammed Al-Arifi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The use of complementary and alternative medicine for functional gastrointestinal disorders among the saudi population.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. The necessity and appropriate range of the diagnostic "gray zone" ofSaudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abdulrahman AlwhaibiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy - King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sultan AlghadeerDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy - King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Salmeen BablghaithDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy - King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Syed WajidDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy - King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ziyad AlrabiahDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy - King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulaziz AlhossanDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy - King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed Al-ArifiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy - King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimDyspepsia is one of the gastrointestinal diseases that is very common worldwide. Despite its prevalence globally, which ranges between 1.8% and 57%, no study has assessed the prevalence in Saudi Arabia. This study was aimed to investigate the prevalence and severity of dyspepsia in the general population of Saudi Arabia.

methodsA modified Short-Form Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire (SF-LDQ) was utilized to conduct our study. The questionnaire score ranges between 0 and 32, where zero indicated no dyspepsia, a score of 1-8 indicated mild dyspepsia, a score of 9-15 indicated moderate dyspepsia and a score of higher than 15 represented severe dyspepsia. Socio-demographic data of the participants including age, gender, marital status, BMI, job description, insurance, and education level were collected. Using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 21.0 (SPSS), a univariate analysis was performed to assess the association of participants characteristics with the prevalence of dyspepsia, whereas logistic regression analysis was used to correlate their characteristics with the severity of dyspepsia.

resultsDuring a period of one month, March 1st to 31st 2019, a total of 778 participants have completed the survey. Most of them were females accounting for 68% of the population, married (63.9%), middle aged (range 34-51 years old) and literate with high school education (72.3%). Ninety two percent (92%) of the study population were found to experience dyspepsia. However, there is no significant association between socio-demographic characteristics and dyspepsia or its severity as well.

conclusionThe prevalence of dyspepsia in Saudi Arabia is the highest in the gulf region which would potentially lead to more GI complications, and associate to poor health and economic outcomes. Education programs are essential to raise the people awareness of dyspepsia and the appropriate ways to prevent it.

Indexed as

DyspepsiaPrevalenceSeverityShort-Form Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire

Identifiers

PMID32922136
PMCPMC7474163

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.