Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32923099›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cardiovascular disease2020

Procedural safety and outcome of ultrathin strut stents (<60 μm) in the management of very long coronary artery stenosis (>30 mm) - A retrospective real world study.

Soumya Patra, Dilip Kumar, Arindam Pande, Sanjeev S Mukherjee, Rana Rathor Roy, Ashesh Halder, Somnath Dey, Rabin Chakraborty

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cardiovascular disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Soumya PatraDepartment of Cardiology, Medical Superspecialty Hospital Kolkata, West Bengal, Pin-700099, India.
Dilip KumarDepartment of Cardiology, Medical Superspecialty Hospital Kolkata, West Bengal, Pin-700099, India.
Arindam PandeDepartment of Cardiology, Medical Superspecialty Hospital Kolkata, West Bengal, Pin-700099, India.
Sanjeev S MukherjeeDepartment of Cardiology, Medical Superspecialty Hospital Kolkata, West Bengal, Pin-700099, India.
Rana Rathor RoyDepartment of Cardiology, Medical Superspecialty Hospital Kolkata, West Bengal, Pin-700099, India.
Ashesh HalderDepartment of Cardiology, Medical Superspecialty Hospital Kolkata, West Bengal, Pin-700099, India.
Somnath DeyDepartment of Cardiology, Medical Superspecialty Hospital Kolkata, West Bengal, Pin-700099, India.
Rabin ChakrabortyDepartment of Cardiology, Medical Superspecialty Hospital Kolkata, West Bengal, Pin-700099, India.
Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ultrathin strut stents (<60 μm) are new in the current stents technology. This technology has assured to have less stent thrombosis, restenosis and better deliverability. Still there is lacking data of using long ultrathin strut stents in very long segment coronary artery disease (>30 mm).

aimThe aim of this retrospective study was to assess the procedural safety and outcome of using ultrathin strut stents in very long segment coronary artery lesion.

methodsIn this retrospective analysis, we have enrolled those patients who had an implant of more than 30 mm length of ultrathin strut stents (Evermine 50

resultsOut of these 156 patients (mean age- 61.2 +/- 10.4 years; male: 114), in 12 patients, these long stents couldn't be delivered. In rest 144 patients, 147 ultrathin strut stents were implanted. In about 56% patients were hypertensive and 48% patients were diabetic. About 63% patients had ACS and rest 37% patients had SIHD. The mean duration of follow up was 8.4 +/- 13.9 months. Average stent length and diameter were 39.5 +/- 5.9 mm and 3.03 +/- 0.4 mm, respectively. There was no acute or sub-acute stent thrombosis and no procedural complication. Five patients died during follow-up (all-cause mortality) and rest are all symptoms free. There were no statistical significant differences seen among the stent types.

conclusionUltrathin strut stents can be considered for stenting in long segment coronary artery stenosis with reasonably good procedural success rate and have good clinical outcome, but needs further large randomized trial before using in this particular clinical condition. Both the stent designs have similar clinical outcome and procedural success.

Indexed as

Angioplastycoronary arterystentultra-thin strut

Identifiers

PMID32923099
PMCPMC7486533
OpenAlexW3085801086

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.