Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32923864›Full record

ArticleJCO precision oncology2019

Exceptional Response to AKT Inhibition in Patients With Breast Cancer and Germline

Belinda Kingston, Caroline Bailleux, Suzette Delaloge, Gaia Schiavon, Veronique Scott, Magali Lacroix-Triki, T Hedley Carr, Iwanka Kozarewa, Heidrun Gevensleben, Zoe Kemp and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in JCO precision oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Breast-Ovarian Hereditary Cancer Syndrome: BeyondCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Targeted therapy in patients with genetic tumor syndromes.Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. AKT and DUBs: a bidirectional relationship.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. AKT kinases as therapeutic targets.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Targeting Akt in cancer for precision therapy.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Belinda KingstonInstitute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Caroline BailleuxInstitut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Suzette DelalogeInstitut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Gaia SchiavonAstraZeneca, IMED Oncology, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Veronique ScottInstitut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Magali Lacroix-TrikiInstitut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
T Hedley CarrAstraZeneca, IMED Oncology, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Iwanka KozarewaAstraZeneca, IMED Oncology, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Heidrun GevenslebenBonn University Hospital, Bonn, Germany.
Zoe KempThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Alex PearsonInstitute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Nicholas TurnerInstitute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Fabrice AndréInstitut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Institut Gustave Roussy · FRAstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GBRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID32923864
PMCPMC7446515
OpenAlexW2993260471

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.