SynthesisBiosensors2020
Biomolecules and Electrochemical Tools in Chronic Non-Communicable Disease Surveillance: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Biosensors, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- FMolecular biology reports · 2023Pooled it
- Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Activity: Analytical Methods and Current Knowledge-A Review.Methods and protocols · 2026Review
- Editorial: Advanced Biosensing Technologies in Medical Applications.Biosensors · 2022Article
- Low Platinum-Content Electrocatalysts for Highly Sensitive Detection of Endogenously Released HBiosensors · 2022Review
- A Methodical Review on the Applications and Potentialities of Using Nanobiosensors for Disease Diagnosis.BioMed research international · 2022Review
- Review on oxidative stress relation on COVID-19: Biomolecular and bioanalytical approach.International journal of biological macromolecules · 2021Review
- Nanobiosensors in neurodegenerative disease diagnosis: A promising pathway for early detection.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Over recent three decades, the electrochemical techniques have become widely used in biological identification and detection, because it presents optimum features for efficient and sensitive molecular detection of organic compounds, being able to trace quantities with a minimum of reagents and sample manipulation. Given these special features, electrochemical techniques are regularly exploited in disease diagnosis and monitoring. Specifically, amperometric electrochemical analysis has proven to be quite suitable for the detection of physiological biomarkers in monitoring health conditions, as well as toward the control of reactive oxygen species released in the course of oxidative burst during inflammatory events. Besides, electrochemical detection techniques involve a simple and swift assessment that provides a low detection-limit for most of the molecules enclosed biological fluids and related to non-transmittable morbidities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.