Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32943772›Full record

ArticleThe pharmacogenomics journal2021

Investigating an in silico approach for prioritizing antidepressant drug prescription based on drug-induced expression profiles and predicted gene expression.

Muhammad Shoaib, Edoardo Giacopuzzi, Oliver Pain, Chiara Fabbri, Chiara Magri, Alessandra Minelli, Cathryn M Lewis, Massimo Gennarelli

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The pharmacogenomics journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07488663 (FROM DISEASE MODELING TO THE MOLECULAR BASES OF TREATMENT RESPONSE FOR OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE DISORDER USING INNOVATIVE THERAPIES AND PATIENT-DERIVED PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07488663 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

From disease modeling to the molecular bases of treatment response for obsessive-compulsive disorder using innovative therapies and patient-derived pluripotent stem cells

TypeinterventionalSponsorASST Fatebenefratelli SaccoRan2023 to 2027Enrolled60ConditionsObsessive - Compulsive DisorderArmsdeep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS), Theta burst stimulation (TBS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Muhammad ShoaibDepartment of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2607-1897
Edoardo Giacopuzzi *National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Oliver Pain *Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Chiara Fabbri *Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Chiara MagriDepartment of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9933-8666
Alessandra MinelliDepartment of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Cathryn M LewisSocial, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK. cathryn.lewis@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8249-8476
Massimo GennarelliDepartment of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In clinical practice, an antidepressant prescription is a trial and error approach, which is time consuming and discomforting for patients. This study investigated an in silico approach for ranking antidepressants based on their hypothetical likelihood of efficacy. We predicted the transcriptomic profile of citalopram remitters by performing an in silico transcriptomic-wide association study on STAR*D GWAS data (N = 1163). The transcriptional profile of remitters was compared with 21 antidepressant-induced gene expression profiles in five human cell lines available in the connectivity-map database. Spearman correlation, Pearson correlation, and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test were used to determine the similarity between antidepressant-induced profiles and remitter profiles, subsequently calculating the average rank of antidepressants across the three methods and a p value for each rank by using a permutation procedure. The drugs with the top ranks were those having a high positive correlation with the expression profiles of remitters and that may have higher chances of efficacy in the tested patients. In MCF7 (breast cancer cell line), escitalopram had the highest average rank, with an average rank higher than expected by chance (p = 0.0014). In A375 (human melanoma) and PC3 (prostate cancer) cell lines, escitalopram and citalopram emerged as the second-highest ranked antidepressants, respectively (p = 0.0310 and 0.0276, respectively). In HA1E (kidney) and HT29 (colon cancer) cell types, citalopram and escitalopram did not fall among top antidepressants. The correlation between citalopram remitters' and (es)citalopram-induced expression profiles in three cell lines suggests that our approach may be useful and with future improvements, it can be applicable at the individual level to tailor treatment prescription.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsCitalopramComputer SimulationDrug PrescriptionsGene ExpressionHT29 CellsHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMCF-7 CellsSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsTranscriptomeAntidepressive AgentsCitalopramSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.