Evidence mapPaperPMID 32948183Full record

ArticleBMC medical genomics2020

Cancer gene expression profiles associated with clinical outcomes to chemotherapy treatments.

Nicolas Borisov, Maxim Sorokin, Victor Tkachev, Andrew Garazha, Anton Buzdin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicolas BorisovDepartment of Bioinformatics and Molecular Networks, OmicsWay Corporation, Walnut, CA, 91788, USA. borisov@oncobox.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1671-5524
Maxim SorokinDepartment of Bioinformatics and Molecular Networks, OmicsWay Corporation, Walnut, CA, 91788, USA.
Victor TkachevDepartment of Bioinformatics and Molecular Networks, OmicsWay Corporation, Walnut, CA, 91788, USA.
Andrew GarazhaDepartment of Bioinformatics and Molecular Networks, OmicsWay Corporation, Walnut, CA, 91788, USA.
Anton BuzdinDepartment of Bioinformatics and Molecular Networks, OmicsWay Corporation, Walnut, CA, 91788, USA.
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology · RUSechenov University · RU

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 18-15-00061.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMachine learning (ML) methods still have limited applicability in personalized oncology due to low numbers of available clinically annotated molecular profiles. This doesn't allow sufficient training of ML classifiers that could be used for improving molecular diagnostics.

methodsWe reviewed published datasets of high throughput gene expression profiles corresponding to cancer patients with known responses on chemotherapy treatments. We browsed Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Tumor Alterations Relevant for GEnomics-driven Therapy (TARGET) repositories.

resultsWe identified data collections suitable to build ML models for predicting responses on certain chemotherapeutic schemes. We identified 26 datasets, ranging from 41 till 508 cases per dataset. All the datasets identified were checked for ML applicability and robustness with leave-one-out cross validation. Twenty-three datasets were found suitable for using ML that had balanced numbers of treatment responder and non-responder cases.

conclusionsWe collected a database of gene expression profiles associated with clinical responses on chemotherapy for 2786 individual cancer cases. Among them seven datasets included RNA sequencing data (for 645 cases) and the others - microarray expression profiles. The cases represented breast cancer, lung cancer, low-grade glioma, endothelial carcinoma, multiple myeloma, adult leukemia, pediatric leukemia and kidney tumors. Chemotherapeutics included taxanes, bortezomib, vincristine, trastuzumab, letrozole, tipifarnib, temozolomide, busulfan and cyclophosphamide.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingMachine LearningAntineoplastic AgentsHumansNeoplasmsProgression-Free SurvivalTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers detectionCancerChemotherapyClinical oncologyGene expressionMachine learningMicroarraysMolecular diagnosticsPersonalized medicineRNA sequencingTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID32948183
PMCPMC7499993
OpenAlexW3087340124

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.