Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32948690›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Transcription factor expression defines subclasses of developing projection neurons highly similar to single-cell RNA-seq subtypes.

Whitney E Heavner, Shaoyi Ji, James H Notwell, Ethan S Dyer, Alex M Tseng, Johannes Birgmeier, Boyoung Yoo, Gill Bejerano, Susan K McConnell

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. The Epigenome in Neurodevelopmental Disorders.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Whitney E HeavnerCenter for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98101.ORCID 0000-0001-6709-4062
Shaoyi JiDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
James H NotwellDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Ethan S DyerStanford Institute for Theoretical Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Alex M TsengDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Johannes BirgmeierDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Boyoung YooDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Gill BejeranoDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Susan K McConnellDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; suemcc@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · USGoogle (United States) · US

Funding

NEUROGENESIS AND MIGRATION IN DEVELOPING CEREBRAL CORTEXR01MH051864 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MCCONNELL, SUSAN K · 1994 to 2006
$2.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH051864
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We are only just beginning to catalog the vast diversity of cell types in the cerebral cortex. Such categorization is a first step toward understanding how diversification relates to function. All cortical projection neurons arise from a uniform pool of progenitor cells that lines the ventricles of the forebrain. It is still unclear how these progenitor cells generate the more than 50 unique types of mature cortical projection neurons defined by their distinct gene-expression profiles. Moreover, exactly how and when neurons diversify their function during development is unknown. Here we relate gene expression and chromatin accessibility of two subclasses of projection neurons with divergent morphological and functional features as they develop in the mouse brain between embryonic day 13 and postnatal day 5 in order to identify transcriptional networks that diversify neuron cell fate. We compare these gene-expression profiles with published profiles of single cells isolated from similar populations and establish that layer-defined cell classes encompass cell subtypes and developmental trajectories identified using single-cell sequencing. Given the depth of our sequencing, we identify groups of transcription factors with particularly dense subclass-specific regulation and subclass-enriched transcription factor binding motifs. We also describe transcription factor-adjacent long noncoding RNAs that define each subclass and validate the function of

Indexed as

Single-Cell AnalysisAnimalsCell DifferentiationCerebral CortexGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalMiceNerve Tissue ProteinsNeuronsRNA-SeqTranscription FactorsNerve Tissue ProteinsTranscription Factorscortical developmentgene regulationnext-generation sequencingtranscription

Identifiers

PMID32948690
PMCPMC7547209
OpenAlexW3087581477

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.