Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32952660›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2020

Analysis of the expression levels and clinical value of miR-365 and miR-25 in serum of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Dongxuan Huang, Wenfang Ou, Huifen Tong, Ming Peng, Yamei Ou, Zeqing Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dongxuan HuangDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518110, P.R. China.
Wenfang OuDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Guangdong Medical University Affiliated Longhua Central Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518110, P.R. China.
Huifen TongDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Guangdong Medical University Affiliated Longhua Central Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518110, P.R. China.
Ming PengDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Guangdong Medical University Affiliated Longhua Central Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518110, P.R. China.
Yamei OuDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Guangdong Medical University Affiliated Longhua Central Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518110, P.R. China.
Zeqing SongDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Guangdong Medical University Affiliated Longhua Central Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518110, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate the expression levels and clinical value of miR-365 and miR-25 in serum of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients (180) diagnosed with NSCLC at the Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University from July 2011 to December 2013 were used as the experimental group. Volunteers (90) undergoing health examinations were used as the control group. The serum of the patients was collected after fasting in the morning. The expression levels of miR-365 and miR-25 in the serum of patients was assessed by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR), and the relationship among miR-365, miR-25 and the postoperative survival rate of NSCLC patients was analyzed. The relative expression level of miR-25 of patients with peripheral infiltration was significantly higher than that of patients without peripheral infiltration (P<0.05). There were significant differences in the relative expression level of miR-25 in different pathological grades and TNM stages, as well as with lymph node metastasis (P<0.05). The survival rate of NSCLC patients with high expression of miR-25 was significantly lower than that of NSCLC patients with low expression of miR-25 (P<0.05). The relative expression level of miR-365 of patients with peripheral infiltration was significantly lower than that of patients without peripheral infiltration (P<0.05). There were significant differences in the relative expression level of miR-365 in different pathological grades and TNM stages, as well as with lymph node metastasis (P<0.05). The survival rate of NSCLC patients with high expression of miR-365 was significantly higher than that of NSCLC patients with low expression of miR-365 (P<0.05). In conclusion, the expression levels of miR-25 and miR-365 were different in the serum of NSCLC patients, and they were closely related to certain clinical characteristics such as peripheral infiltration, pathological grade, tumor diameter, TNM stage and lymph node metastasis. Moreover, it was revealed that miR-25 and miR-365 affected the 5-year survival rate of patients. miR-25 and miR-365 could be used as important tumor markers to evaluate the prognosis of NSCLC patients.

Indexed as

clinical pathologymiR-25miR-365NSCLCprognosis

Identifiers

PMID32952660
PMCPMC7479530

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.