Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32957671›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

ASAMS: An Adaptive Sequential Sampling and Automatic Model Selection for Artificial Intelligence Surrogate Modeling.

Carlos A Duchanoy, Hiram Calvo, Marco A Moreno-Armendáriz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carlos A DuchanoyInstituto Politécnico Nacional, Centro de Investigación en Computación, Av. Juan de Dios Bátiz s/n, Ciudad de México 07738, Mexico.
Hiram CalvoInstituto Politécnico Nacional, Centro de Investigación en Computación, Av. Juan de Dios Bátiz s/n, Ciudad de México 07738, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-2836-2102
Marco A Moreno-ArmendárizInstituto Politécnico Nacional, Centro de Investigación en Computación, Av. Juan de Dios Bátiz s/n, Ciudad de México 07738, Mexico.

Funding

CSP VA 556FOINS program of Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT),Problemas Nacionales 5241SIP-IPN research grants SIP 20200640SIP-IPN research grants SIP 20200811SIP-IPN research grants SIP 2083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surrogate Modeling (SM) is often used to reduce the computational burden of time-consuming system simulations. However, continuous advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the spread of embedded sensors have led to the creation of Digital Twins (DT), Design Mining (DM), and Soft Sensors (SS). These methodologies represent a new challenge for the generation of surrogate models since they require the implementation of elaborated artificial intelligence algorithms and minimize the number of physical experiments measured. To reduce the assessment of a physical system, several existing adaptive sequential sampling methodologies have been developed; however, they are limited in most part to the Kriging models and Kriging-model-based Monte Carlo Simulation. In this paper, we integrate a distinct adaptive sampling methodology to an automated machine learning methodology (AutoML) to help in the process of model selection while minimizing the system evaluation and maximizing the system performance for surrogate models based on artificial intelligence algorithms. In each iteration, this framework uses a grid search algorithm to determine the best candidate models and perform a leave-one-out cross-validation to calculate the performance of each sampled point. A Voronoi diagram is applied to partition the sampling region into some local cells, and the Voronoi vertexes are considered as new candidate points. The performance of the sample points is used to estimate the accuracy of the model for a set of candidate points to select those that will improve more the model's accuracy. Then, the number of candidate models is reduced. Finally, the performance of the framework is tested using two examples to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed method.

Indexed as

adaptive sequential samplingmachine learningsurrogate model

Identifiers

PMID32957671
PMCPMC7571090

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.