Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32965736›Full record

ReviewFASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology2020

SARS-CoV-2 and the possible connection to ERs, ACE2, and RAGE: Focus on susceptibility factors.

Roberta Sessa Stilhano, Angelica Jardim Costa, Michelle Sayuri Nishino, Shahin Shams, Cynthia Silva Bartolomeo, Ana Cristina Breithaupt-Faloppa, Eduardo Alexandre Silva, Ana Lopez Ramirez, Carla Maximo Prado, Rodrigo Portes Ureshino

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Estrogen and viral infection.Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Roberta Sessa StilhanoDepartment of Physiological Sciences, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Angelica Jardim CostaDepartment of Pharmacology, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Michelle Sayuri NishinoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Diadema, Brazil.
Shahin ShamsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Cynthia Silva BartolomeoDepartment of Physiological Sciences, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Cristina Breithaupt-FaloppaLaboratorio de Cirurgia Cardiovascular e Fisiopatologia da Circulação (LIM-11), Instituto do Coração (InCor), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eduardo Alexandre SilvaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Ana Lopez RamirezCambridge Institute for Medical Research, Cambridge, UK.
Carla Maximo PradoDepartment of Biosciences, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Santos, Brazil.
Rodrigo Portes UreshinoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Diadema, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BRUniversity of California, Davis · USFaculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo · BRHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

Predoctoral Training in Pharmacological SciencesT32GM099608 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI HELL, JOHANNES W · 2012 to 2021
$2.2M
American Heart Association (AHA) 19IPLOI34760654Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) code 001FAP-FCMSCSP 2019/2021Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) 2016/20796-2Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) 2018/06088-0Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) 2018/16719-8Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) 2020/04709-8HHS | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) T32GM099608MCTI | Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) 303035/2018-8NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM099608
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has provoked major stresses on the health-care systems of several countries, and caused the death of more than a quarter of a million people globally, mainly in the elderly population with preexisting pathologies. Previous studies with coronavirus (SARS-CoV) point to gender differences in infection and disease progression with increased susceptibility in male patients, indicating that estrogens may be associated with physiological protection against the coronavirus. Therefore, the objectives of this work are threefold. First, we aim to summarize the SARS-CoV-2 infection pathway and the roles both the virus and patient play in COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease 2019) progression, clinical symptomatology, and mortality. Second, we detail the effect estrogen has on viral infection and host infection response, including its role in both the regulation of key viral receptor expression and the mediation of inflammatory activity. Finally, we describe how ERs (estrogen receptors) and RAGE (receptor for advanced glycation end-products) play a critical role in metabolic pathways, which we envisage could maintain a close interplay with SARS-CoV and COVID-19 mortality rates, despite a current lack of research directly determining how. Taken together, we present the current state of the field regarding SARS-CoV-2 research and illuminate where research is needed to better define the role both estrogen and metabolic comorbidities have in the COVID-19 disease state, which can be key in screening potential therapeutic options as the search for effective treatments continue.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2AnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmBetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Disease SusceptibilityEstrogensFemaleHumansLungMaleMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesPandemicsPeptidyl-Dipeptidase AACE2 protein, humanAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2Antigens, NeoplasmEstrogensMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesMOK protein, humanPeptidyl-Dipeptidase AReceptors, EstrogenACE2COVID-19estrogenRAGE

Identifiers

PMID32965736
PMCPMC7537138
OpenAlexW3023339305

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.