Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32990796›Full record

ArticleDie Naturwissenschaften2020

Sex and burrowing behavior and their implications with lytic activity in the sand-dwelling spider Allocosa senex.

Andrea Albín, Miguel Simó, Franco Cargnelutti, Anita Aisenberg, Lucía Calbacho-Rosa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Die Naturwissenschaften, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrea AlbínDepartamento de Ecología y Biología Evolutiva, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable, Avenida Italia 3318, 11600, Montevideo, CP, Uruguay. andrea.r.albin@gmail.com.
Miguel SimóSección Entomología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Franco CargneluttiFacultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Departamento de Diversidad Biológica y Ecología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.
Anita AisenbergDepartamento de Ecología y Biología Evolutiva, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable, Avenida Italia 3318, 11600, Montevideo, CP, Uruguay.
Lucía Calbacho-RosaFacultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Departamento de Diversidad Biológica y Ecología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.
Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable · UYConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARUniversidad de la República · UYUniversidad Nacional de Córdoba · AR

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación POS_NAC_2013_1_555Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación S/NConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas S/NPrograma de Desarrollo de las Ciencias Básicas S/N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The immune response can be costly. Studies in several arthropod species have indicated a trade-off between immunity and other life-history traits, including reproduction. In sexually dimorphic species in which females and males largely differ in their life history strategies and related energetic demands, we can expect to find sex differences in immune functions. Sex differences in immunity are well documented in vertebrates; however, we largely lack data from invertebrate systems. Lytic activity, the immune system's ability to lysate bacteria and viruses, has been widely used as a proxy for the strength of the immune response in several invertebrates. With this in mind, we used the burrowing wolf spider Allocosa senex to test differences in lytic activity between females and males. We also studied whether digging behavior affects the immune responses in this species. While females of A. senex construct simple refuges where they stay during the day, males construct deep burrows, which they donate to females after copulation. In accordance with our hypothesis, females showed higher lytic activity compared with males, and those males who dug showed higher levels of lytic activity than those that did not dig. Furthermore, male body condition and lytic activity did not correlate with burrow length, a trait under female choice in this species. Our results show sexual dimorphism in lytic activity responses, which are likely related to differences in life-history strategies and energetic requirements of each sex in A. senex spiders.

Indexed as

AnimalsFemaleMaleNesting BehaviorSex FactorsSexual Behavior, AnimalSpidersImmunologyLycosidaeLytic activitySexual dimorphismTrade-off

Identifiers

PMID32990796
OpenAlexW3090401996

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.