ArticleAsian journal of urology2020
Laparoscopic transvesical vesicovaginal fistula repair with the least invasive way: Only three trocars and a limited posterior cystotomy.
Article in Asian journal of urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surgical Outcomes of Lower Genitourinary Fistula Repair: A Prospective Cohort Study From an Indian Tertiary Hospital.Cureus · 2025Article
- Preliminary experience with minimally invasive transvaginal single-port laparoscopic vesicovaginal fistula repair: report of 10 cases.International urology and nephrology · 2025Article
- Analysis of Various Surgical Approaches to Supratrigonal Vesicovaginal Fistula Repair: A Tertiary Care Centre Experience.International urogynecology journal · 2025Article
- Article
- Management of Urinary Tract Injuries by Laparoscopy: Our Experience.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
- Our experience of laparoscopic vesicovaginal fistula repair in a tertiary care center.Urology annalsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTwo conventional approaches for vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) repair are transabdominal repair for supratrigonal VVF and transvaginal approach for low lying fistulae. Laparoscopic surgery was introduced to duplicate the surgical steps of the transabdominal approach with reduction in morbidity. We report a series of patients treated with a modified laparoscopic technique which includes the use of only three trocars and a limited posterior cystotomy.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the data of eight patients who underwent laparoscopic VVF repair with our standardized technique from January 2015 to April 2018. Only cases with a supratrigonal fistula were included. We constantly used only three trocars. A limited 2 cm midline posterior cystotomy was performed using ultrasonic energy. A stay suture on a straight needle was passed percutaneously in the abdomen, then on either side of the cystotomy and finally was exteriorized to maintain countertraction. The cystotomy was extended downwards to include the fistula site. The fistula was dissected circumferentially to raise the bladder and vaginal flaps. The vaginal defect was closed in a transverse fashion and the cystotomy was closed vertically.
resultsMean operative time was 178±31.6 min and estimated blood loss was 60±18.7 mL. Flap interposition was performed in six cases. No intraoperative complications were recorded. Mean hospital stay was 2.25±0.89 days. During hospitalization two patients experienced postoperative complications (Clavien grade I). Mean follow-up was 20.9±11.1 months (6.0-39.0 months). All patients remained continent during the follow-up period.
conclusionsThis minimally invasive laparoscopic approach with only three trocars and limited posterior cystotomy provides excellent results with minimum morbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.