Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33000754›Full record

ArticleBlood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue2021

Blood donation among individuals of African origin in the Netherlands: how are barriers and motivators associated with intention?

Elisabeth F Klinkenberg, Mirjam P Fransen, Wim L A M de Kort, Julia C M van Weert, Elisabeth M J Huis In 't Veld

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. When the available blood supply mismatches the needs of the patient.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Blood donation for all: inclusivity is important to the blood supply.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elisabeth F KlinkenbergDepartment of Donor Medicine Research, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Mirjam P FransenDepartment of Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Wim L A M de KortDepartment of Donor Medicine Research, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Julia C M van WeertAmsterdam School of Communication Research/ASCoR, Department of Communication Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Elisabeth M J Huis In 't VeldDepartment of Donor Medicine Research, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
University of Amsterdam · NLGGD Amsterdam · NLSanquin · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlood donors of African origin are under-represented in high-income Western countries, while their extended blood types closely match chronic transfusion patients with similar ancestral backgrounds. To prevent alloimunisation, it is important to recruit and retain more African blood donors. The aim of this study was to gain insight into blood donation barriers and motivators of individuals of African origin, and to assess how these are associated with the intention to donate blood. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn online survey sample included 300 participants of sub-Saharan African, Afro-Surinamese and Afro-Caribbean origin living in the Netherlands. They ranked 25 barriers and 19 motivators on the level of impediment and facilitation in blood donation. We compared differences in barriers and motivators between ever- and never-donors and tested associations with the intention to donate blood using univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses, adjusted for gender, age, ethnicity, immigrant generation, educational level, and blood donation history.

resultsReceiving information about the donation procedure was a highly ranked motivator especially among never-donors (50%) and was positively associated with the intention to donate (p<0.05). Non-monetary incentives, convenience factors and awareness were other important motivators. Highly ranked barriers related to fears and not feeling healthy enough to donate, although only "believing donation is scary or stressful" (reported by 8% of the ever-donors and 25% of the never-donors) remained significantly associated with intention to donate in the multivariate model (p<0.05). Recipient preferences, religion and distrust were less often reported and were not associated with donation intention. DISCUSSION: The highest ranked barriers and motivators were not necessarily the best predictors of donation intention. These findings have valuable implications for future interventions focussing on individuals of African origin.

Indexed as

Blood DonorsAdolescentAdultAgedBlack PeopleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationNetherlandsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33000754
PMCPMC7850918
OpenAlexW3089872975

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.