Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33003305›Full record

ArticleMetabolites2020

Circulating Metabolites as Potential Biomarkers for Neurological Disorders-Metabolites in Neurological Disorders.

Amanda Donatti, Amanda M Canto, Alexandre B Godoi, Douglas C da Rosa, Iscia Lopes-Cendes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolites, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. List2Net: Linking multiple lists of biological data in a network context.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amanda DonattiDepartment of Medical Genetics and Genomic Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Tessália Vieira de Camargo, 126 Cidade Universitária "Zeferino Vaz", Campinas SP 13083-887, Brazil.
Amanda M CantoDepartment of Medical Genetics and Genomic Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Tessália Vieira de Camargo, 126 Cidade Universitária "Zeferino Vaz", Campinas SP 13083-887, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3989-8351
Alexandre B GodoiDepartment of Medical Genetics and Genomic Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Tessália Vieira de Camargo, 126 Cidade Universitária "Zeferino Vaz", Campinas SP 13083-887, Brazil.
Douglas C da RosaDepartment of Medical Genetics and Genomic Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Tessália Vieira de Camargo, 126 Cidade Universitária "Zeferino Vaz", Campinas SP 13083-887, Brazil.
Iscia Lopes-CendesDepartment of Medical Genetics and Genomic Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Tessália Vieira de Camargo, 126 Cidade Universitária "Zeferino Vaz", Campinas SP 13083-887, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6221-6822
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 311923/2019-4Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 403299/2016-0Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2013/07559-3Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2015/12960-4Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2015/25607-0Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2019/00048-0Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2019/00213-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are, still, limitations to predicting the occurrence and prognosis of neurological disorders. Biomarkers are molecules that can change in different conditions, a feature that makes them potential tools to improve the diagnosis of disease, establish a prognosis, and monitor treatments. Metabolites can be used as biomarkers, and are small molecules derived from the metabolic process found in different biological media, such as tissue samples, cells, or biofluids. They can be identified using various strategies, targeted or untargeted experiments, and by different techniques, such as high-performance liquid chromatography, mass spectrometry, or nuclear magnetic resonance. In this review, we aim to discuss the current knowledge about metabolites as biomarkers for neurological disorders. We will present recent developments that show the need and the feasibility of identifying such biomarkers in different neurological disorders, as well as discuss relevant research findings in the field of metabolomics that are helping to unravel the mechanisms underlying neurological disorders. Although several relevant results have been reported in metabolomic studies in patients with neurological diseases, there is still a long way to go for the clinical use of metabolites as potential biomarkers in these disorders, and more research in the field is needed.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseamyotrophic lateral sclerosisepilepsymagnetic nuclear resonancemass spectrometrymetabolomicsmultiple sclerosisParkinson’s diseasestroke

Identifiers

PMID33003305
PMCPMC7601919
OpenAlexW3087780951

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.