Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33004485›Full record

ReviewGenes & development2020

A most formidable arsenal: genetic technologies for building a better mouse.

James F Clark, Colin J Dinsmore, Philippe Soriano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes & development, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Harmonizing mouse anatomy terminology: a common language?Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Recent Advances in In Vivo Somatic Cell Gene Modification in Newborn Pups.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. The Ontology of Biological Attributes (OBA)-computational traits for the life sciences.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The Wnt1-Cre2 transgene is active in the male germline.Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000) · 2022
    Article
  18. Recent Advances in the Production of Genome-Edited Rats.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

James F Clark *Department of Cell, Developmental, and Regenerative Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai, New York, New York 10029, USA.
Colin J Dinsmore *Department of Cell, Developmental, and Regenerative Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai, New York, New York 10029, USA.
Philippe SorianoDepartment of Cell, Developmental, and Regenerative Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai, New York, New York 10029, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0427-926X

Funding

FGF Signaling Pathways and Craniofacial DevelopmentR01DE022778 · NIDCR · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI SORIANO, PHILIPPE M · 2012 to 2022
$6.6M
Growth Factor Signaling and Craniofacial DevelopmentR01DE022363 · NIDCR · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI SORIANO, PHILIPPE M · 2012 to 2022
$6.4M
Novel Effectors of FGF Signaling in Craniofacial DevelopmentF32DE029387 · NIDCR · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI CLARK, JAMES · 2020 to 2022
$208k
SRF Modularity During Craniofacial DevelopmentF32DE026678 · NIDCR · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI DINSMORE, COLIN J · 2016 to 2019
$185k
NIDCR NIH HHS F32 DE026678NIDCR NIH HHS F32 DE029387NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE022363NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE022778
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mouse is one of the most widely used model organisms for genetic study. The tools available to alter the mouse genome have developed over the preceding decades from forward screens to gene targeting in stem cells to the recent influx of CRISPR approaches. In this review, we first consider the history of mice in genetic study, the development of classic approaches to genome modification, and how such approaches have been used and improved in recent years. We then turn to the recent surge of nuclease-mediated techniques and how they are changing the field of mouse genetics. Finally, we survey common classes of alleles used in mice and discuss how they might be engineered using different methods.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalAnimalsGenetic TechniquesMiceCRISPRgene targetinggeneticsmicetransgenesis

Identifiers

PMID33004485
PMCPMC7528699

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.