Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33009815›Full record

Trial reportThe international journal of neuropsychopharmacology2020

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Intranasal Neuropeptide Y in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder.

Aleksander A Mathé, Miranda Michaneck, Elisabeth Berg, Dennis S Charney, James W Murrough

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Intranasal Application of Peptides Modulating the Neuropeptide Y System.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Neuropeptidergic systems in psychiatric disorders.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025
    Review
  11. Neuropeptide Y and Pain: Insights from Brain Research.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Aleksander A MathéCenter for Psychiatric Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Miranda MichaneckCenter for Psychiatric Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Elisabeth BergCenter for Psychiatric Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Dennis S CharneyOffice of the Dean, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
James W MurroughDepression and Anxiety Center for Discovery and Treatment, Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Karolinska Institutet · SECenter for Discovery · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince about one-third of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) do not respond adequately to available antidepressants, there is a need for treatments based on novel mechanisms of action. Neuropeptide Y (NPY), a normal brain constituent, is reduced in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with MDD and post-traumatic stress disorder and in corresponding rodent models. Moreover, NPY administered centrally or intranasally rescues pathophysiology in these models. Consequently, we conducted the first, to our knowledge, controlled trial of NPY as a treatment for MDD.

methodsThirty MDD patients on a stable dose of a conventional antidepressant insufflated 6.8 mg NPY (n = 12) or placebo (n = 18) in a double blind randomized fashion. Effects were assessed at baseline, +1 hour, +5 hours, +24 hours, and +48 hours. The primary outcome was change in depression severity measured with the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS).

resultsNPY was superior to placebo at +24 hours (change -10.3 [95% CI: -13.8; -6.8]) vs -5.6 (95% CI: -8.4; -2.7); group*time F = 3.26, DF = (1,28), P = .04; Cohen's d = 0.67). At +5 hours MADRS decreased -7.1 ([95% CI: -10.0; -4.2] vs -3.5 [95% CI: -5.8; -1.2]; group*time F = 2.69, DF = (1,28), P = .05; Cohen's d = 0.61). MADRS reduction at +48 hours was not significant.

conclusionsSince no results regarding the trajectory of NPY effects existed prior to this study we extrapolated from the known NPY biology and predicted the effects will occur 5-48 hours post insufflation. We chose +48 hours as the primary endpoint and +1, +5, and +24 hours as secondary endpoints. The results, the first of their kind, indicate that insufflated NPY is antidepressant, despite not meeting the primary outcome, and call for dose ranging and repeated NPY insufflation trials. CLINICAL

trial registrationEudraCT Number: 2014-000129-19.

Indexed as

Administration, IntranasalAdultAgedAntidepressive AgentsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedNeuropeptide YOutcome Assessment, Health CareSeverity of Illness IndexAntidepressive AgentsNeuropeptide YantidepressantDepressionintranasalneuropeptide Yresilience

Identifiers

PMID33009815
PMCPMC7770516
OpenAlexW3089657891

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.