ArticleEvolution letters2020
How female × male and male × male interactions influence competitive fertilization in
Article in Evolution letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effects of sexual selection on functional and molecular reproductive divergence during experimental evolution in seed beetles.Evolution letters · 2026Article
- Thirty Years of the Biology of Spermatozoa: The Rise and Future of an Evolutionary Paradigm.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Ejaculate Ejection by Female Fruit Flies Does Not Correlate With Mating Latency or Male Presence, Irrespective of How Ejection Is Measured.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Long-sperm precedence and other cryptic female choices in Drosophila melanogaster.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2025Article
- Genomics of a sexually selected sperm ornament and female preference in Drosophila.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025Article
- Synthesis and Scope of the Role of Postmating Prezygotic Isolation in Speciation.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024Review
- Proteomic diversification of spermatostyles among six species of whirligig beetles.Molecular reproduction and development · 2024Article
- The centrosome - diverse functions in fertilization and development across species.Journal of cell science · 2023Review
- Interplay between male quality and male-female compatibility across episodes of sexual selection.Science advances · 2023Article
- Genotype-by-environment interactions influence the composition of theProceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Social group composition modulates the role of last male sperm precedence in post-copulatory sexual selection.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2023Article
- The coevolutionary dynamics of cryptic female choice.Evolution letters · 2023Article
- Ranking parameters driving siring success during sperm competition in the North African houbara bustard.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Selection on sperm size in response to promiscuity and variation in female sperm storage organs.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2023Article
- Sperm competition in yellow dung flies: No consistent effect of sperm size.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2022Article
- The evolution of sex peptide: sexual conflict, cooperation, and coevolution.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022Article
- The life history ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Article
- Female-induced selective modification of sperm protein SUMOylation-potential mechanistic insights into the non-random fertilization in humans.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2022Article
- Population differences and domestication effects on mating and remating frequencies in Queensland fruit fly.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
How males and females contribute to joint reproductive success has been a long-standing question in sexual selection. Under postcopulatory sexual selection, paternity success is predicted to derive from complex interactions among females engaging in cryptic female choice and males engaging in sperm competition. Such interactions have been identified as potential sources of genetic variation in sexually selected traits but are also expected to inhibit trait diversification. To date, studies of interactions between females and competing males have focused almost exclusively on genotypes and not phenotypic variation in sexually selected traits. Here, we characterize within- and between-sex interactions in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.