Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33015192›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes research2020

Appropriate Timing of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosis in Medium- and Low-Risk Women: Effectiveness of the Italian NHS Recommendations in Preventing Fetal Macrosomia.

Paola Quaresima, Federica Visconti, Eusebio Chiefari, Maria Mirabelli, Massimo Borelli, Patrizia Caroleo, Daniela Foti, Luigi Puccio, Roberta Venturella, Costantino Di Carlo and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Paola QuaresimaUnit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University "Magna Græcia" of Catanzaro, Viale Europa, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Federica ViscontiUnit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University "Magna Græcia" of Catanzaro, Viale Europa, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Eusebio ChiefariDepartment of Health Sciences, University "Magna Græcia" of Catanzaro, Viale Europa, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Maria MirabelliDepartment of Health Sciences, University "Magna Græcia" of Catanzaro, Viale Europa, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Massimo BorelliUMG School of PhD Programmes Life Sciences and Technologies, University "Magna Græcia" of Catanzaro, Italy.
Patrizia CaroleoComplex Operative Structure Endocrinology-Diabetology, Hospital Pugliese-Ciaccio, Viale Pio X, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Daniela FotiDepartment of Health Sciences, University "Magna Græcia" of Catanzaro, Viale Europa, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Luigi PuccioComplex Operative Structure Endocrinology-Diabetology, Hospital Pugliese-Ciaccio, Viale Pio X, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Roberta VenturellaUnit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University "Magna Græcia" of Catanzaro, Viale Europa, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Costantino Di CarloUnit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University "Magna Græcia" of Catanzaro, Viale Europa, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Antonio BrunettiDepartment of Health Sciences, University "Magna Græcia" of Catanzaro, Viale Europa, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1533-8779
Magna Graecia University · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Pugliese Ciaccio · ITUniversity of Trieste · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScreening strategies for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) earlier than 24-28 weeks of gestation should be considered to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes. Nonetheless, there is uncertainty about which women would benefit most from early screening and which screening strategies should be offered to women with GDM. The Italian National Healthcare Service (NHS) recommendations on selective screening for GDM at 16-18 weeks of gestation are effective in preventing fetal macrosomia in high-risk (HR) women, but the appropriateness of timing and effectiveness of these recommendations in medium- (MR) and low-risk (LR) women are still controversial.

results219 (28.5%) women were diagnosed with GDM, while 550 (71.5%) were normal glucose-tolerant women. Out of 164 HR women, only 62 (37.8%) underwent the recommended early screening for GDM at 16-18 weeks of gestation. AC and EFW percentiles, as well as neonates' BW percentiles, were significantly higher in HR women diagnosed with GDM at 24-28 weeks of gestation with respect to normal glucose-tolerant women, as well as MR and LR women who tested positive for GDM. Comparative analysis between MR and LR women with GDM and women with normal glucose tolerance revealed significant differences in both AC and EFW percentiles (

conclusionIn MR and LR women with GDM, a mild acceleration of fetal growth can be detected at the time of anomaly scan. However, in these at-risk categories, the NHS recommendations for screening and treatment of GDM at 24-28 weeks of gestation are still effective in normalizing BW and preventing fetal macrosomia, thus supporting a risk factor-based selective screening program for GDM.

Indexed as

AdultAnthropometryBirth WeightBlood GlucoseDiabetes, GestationalFemaleFemurFetal DevelopmentFetal MacrosomiaFetal WeightGestational AgeGlucose Tolerance TestHumansInfant, NewbornItalyPregnancyBlood Glucose

Identifiers

PMID33015192
PMCPMC7520011
OpenAlexW3087313521

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.