ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2020
Clinical characteristics and ultra-widefield fundus image analysis of two siblings with Bardet-Biedl syndrome type 1 p.Met390Arg variant.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of a Novel Homozygous Missense (c.443A>T:p.N148I) Mutation inBioMed research international · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo present the case of two siblings with a genetic diagnosis of Bardet Biedl syndrome (BBS) type 1, yet different clinical profiles and disease manifestations. OBSERVATIONS: Sequencing analysis revealed a p.Met390Arg pathogenic variant in the BBS1 gene of both patients, as well as several additional variants of uncertain significance Patient 1 was 41 years old, had three primary (cone-rod dystrophy, hypogonadism, and truncal obesity) and three secondary (arterial hypertension, strabismus, and astigmatism) BBS features. He also had insulin resistance, as well as low levels of total testosterone and cortisol. Patient 2 was 43 years old, had two primary (cone-rod dystrophy and truncal obesity), and four secondary (arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, strabismus, and astigmatism) BBS features. Both patients had severe maculopathy; however, patient 1 had bone-spicules that extended up to the mid-periphery, in a perivenular pattern, and significant vascular attenuation with "ghost vessel" appearance towards the temporal periphery, a feature that was absent on patient 2. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: The intrafamilial phenotypic variability among our patients supports the hypothesis that BBS is a disease with genetic, hormonal, and environmental triggers interacting to produce phenotypic variability. Although our report may not establish a definite relationship between environmental and genetic influences, their role should be explored in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.