Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33019735›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

What Is Rural Adversity, How Does It Affect Wellbeing and What Are the Implications for Action?

Joanne Lawrence-Bourne, Hazel Dalton, David Perkins, Jane Farmer, Georgina Luscombe, Nelly Oelke, Nasser Bagheri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Higher hospitalization and mortality rates among SARS-CoV-2-infected persons in rural America.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Joanne Lawrence-BourneCentre for Rural and Remote Mental Health, University of Newcastle, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9819-7398
Hazel DaltonCentre for Rural and Remote Mental Health, University of Newcastle, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5816-4548
David PerkinsCentre for Rural and Remote Mental Health, University of Newcastle, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9739-7339
Jane FarmerSocial Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia.
Georgina LuscombeSchool of Rural Health, University of Sydney, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.
Nelly OelkeSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Social Development, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1666-5360
Nasser BagheriCentre for Mental Health Research, Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.
Centre for Rural and Remote Mental Health · AUAustralian National University · AUCamden and Campbelltown Hospitals · AUSwinburne University of Technology · AUUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing body of literature recognises the profound impact of adversity on mental health outcomes for people living in rural and remote areas. With the cumulative effects of persistent drought, record-breaking bushfires, limited access to quality health services, the COVID-19 pandemic and ongoing economic and social challenges, there is much to understand about the impact of adversity on mental health and wellbeing in rural populations. In this conceptual paper, we aim to review and adapt our existing understanding of rural adversity. We undertook a wide-ranging review of the literature, sought insights from multiple disciplines and critically developed our findings with an expert disciplinary group from across Australia. We propose that rural adversity be understood using a rural ecosystem lens to develop greater clarity around the dimensions and experiences of adversity, and to help identify the opportunities for interventions. We put forward a dynamic conceptual model of the impact of rural adversity on mental health and wellbeing, and close with a discussion of the implications for policy and practice. Whilst this paper has been written from an Australian perspective, it has implications for rural communities internationally.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityMental HealthRural PopulationAustraliaCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansPandemicsPneumonia, Viralcommunity wellbeingintersectionalityrural adversityrural communitiesruralityrural mental healthrural theorysocial determinants

Identifiers

PMID33019735
PMCPMC7578975
OpenAlexW3089621766

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.