Evidence mapPaperPMID 33022367Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials2020

Design and methods of NYC care calls: An effectiveness trial of telephone-delivered type 2 diabetes self-management support.

Jeffrey S Gonzalez, Claire J Hoogendoorn, Jill Linnell, Sarah Fishman, Victoria Jonas, Hang Pham-Singer, Clyde B Schechter, Elizabeth A Walker, Winfred Y Wu

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions for improving health literacy in migrants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey S GonzalezFerkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY, USA; Departments of Medicine (Endocrinology) and Epidemiology & Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA; The Fleischer Institute for Diabetes and Metabolism, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA. Electronic address: jeffrey.gonzalez@yu.edu.
Claire J HoogendoornFerkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY, USA.
Jill LinnellNew York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Long Island City, NY, USA.
Sarah FishmanFerkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY, USA.
Victoria JonasFerkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY, USA.
Hang Pham-SingerNew York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Long Island City, NY, USA.
Clyde B SchechterDepartment of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Elizabeth A WalkerDepartments of Medicine (Endocrinology) and Epidemiology & Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Winfred Y WuNew York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Long Island City, NY, USA.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USNew York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene · USYeshiva University · US

Funding

NYR-Diabetes Research Center (NYR-DRC)P30DK020541 · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · 2025 to 2025
$2.4M
New York Regional Center for Diabetes Translation ResearchP30DK111022 · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · 2025 to 2025
$810k
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020541NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK111022NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK104845NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK121298NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK121896NIDDK NIH HHS R18 DK098742
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although problems with type 2 diabetes (T2D) self-management and treatment adherence often co-occur with emotional distress, few translatable intervention approaches are available that can target these related problems in primary care practice settings. The New York City (NYC) Care Calls study is a randomized controlled trial that tests the effectiveness of structured support for diabetes self-management and distress management, delivered via telephone by health educators, in improving glycemic control, self-management and emotional well-being among predominantly ethnic minority and socioeconomically disadvantaged adults with suboptimally controlled T2D. English- and Spanish-speaking adults treated for T2D in NYC primary care practices were recruited based on having an A1C ≥ 7.5% despite being prescribed medications for diabetes. Participants (N = 812) were randomly assigned to a telephonic intervention condition with a stepped protocol of 6-12 phone calls over 1 year, delivered by a health educator, or to a comparison condition of enhanced usual care. The primary outcome is change in A1C over one year, measured at baseline and again approximately 6- and 12-months later. Secondary outcomes measured on the same schedule include blood pressure, patient-reported emotional distress, treatment adherence and self-management behaviors. A comprehensive effectiveness evaluation is guided by the RE-AIM framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) to gather data that can inform dissemination and implementation of the intervention, if successful. This paper describes the study rationale, trial design, and methodology.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Self-ManagementAdultEthnicityHumansMinority GroupsNew York CityRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSelf CareTelephoneBehavioral interventionDiabetes distressRE-AIMSelf-managementTreatment adherenceType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID33022367
PMCPMC8603947
OpenAlexW3089430323

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.