Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33025257›Full record

ReviewThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2020

Costs and where to find them: identifying unit costs for health economic evaluations of diabetes in France, Germany and Italy.

J Pöhlmann, K Norrbacka, K S Boye, W J Valentine, H Sapin

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ataxia patient care pathway and associated healthcare costs in Italy: a cross-sectional survey.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Friedreich's ataxia patient pathway in Europe.Frontiers in health services · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Patient-level cost analysis of subfertility pathways in the Dutch healthcare system.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Unit Costs in Health Economic Evaluations: Quo Vadis, Austria?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

J PöhlmannOssian Health Economics and Communications, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8065-755X
K NorrbackaEli Lilly Finland, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8308-3088
K S BoyeEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
W J ValentineOssian Health Economics and Communications, Basel, Switzerland.
H SapinLilly France, 24 Bd Vital Bouhot, CS 50004, 92521, Neuilly-sur-Seine Cedex, France. sapin_helene@lilly.com.
Eli Lilly (United States) · USHôpital américain de paris · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth economic evaluations require cost data as key inputs. Many countries do not have standardized reference costs so costs used often vary between studies, thereby reducing transparency and transferability. The present review provided a comprehensive overview of cost sources and suggested unit costs for France, Germany and Italy, to support health economic evaluations in these countries, particularly in the field of diabetes.

methodsA literature review was conducted across multiple databases to identify published unit costs and cost data sources for resource items commonly used in health economic evaluations of antidiabetic therapies. The quality of unit cost reporting was assessed with regard to comprehensiveness of cost reporting and referencing as well as accessibility of cost sources from published cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) of antidiabetic medications.

resultsAn overview of cost sources, including tariff and fee schedules as well as published estimates, was developed for France, Germany and Italy, covering primary and specialist outpatient care, emergency care, hospital treatment, pharmacy costs and lost productivity. Based on these sources, unit cost datasets were suggested for each country. The assessment of unit cost reporting showed that only 60% and 40% of CEAs reported unit costs and referenced them for all pharmacy items, respectively. Less than 20% of CEAs obtained all pharmacy costs from publicly available sources.

conclusionsThis review provides a comprehensive account of available costs and cost sources in France, Germany and Italy to support health economists and increase transparency in health economic evaluations in diabetes.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusCost-Benefit AnalysisFranceGermanyHumansItalyCostCost-effectivenessDiabetesFranceGermanyItaly

Identifiers

PMID33025257
PMCPMC7561572
OpenAlexW3091780717

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.