ArticleBulletin of mathematical biology2020
Impact of Force Function Formulations on the Numerical Simulation of Centre-Based Models.
Article in Bulletin of mathematical biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emergent stable tissue shapes from the regulatory feedback between morphogens and cell growth.Journal of theoretical biology · 2026Article
- Emergent Stable Tissue Shapes from the Regulatory Feedback between Morphogens and Cell Growth.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- A Simple Framework for Agent-Based Modeling with Extracellular Matrix.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2025Article
- In silico study of heterogeneous tumour-derived organoid response to CAR T-cell therapy.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Contributions of cell behavior to geometric order in embryonic cartilage.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Free and Interfacial Boundaries in Individual-Based Models of Multicellular Biological systems.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2023Article
- BMX: Biological modelling and interface exchange.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- CBMOS: a GPU-enabled Python framework for the numerical study of center-based models.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Seven challenges in the multiscale modeling of multicellular tissues.WIREs mechanisms of disease · 2022Review
- Derivation of continuum models from discrete models of mechanical forces in cell populations.Journal of mathematical biology · 2021Article
- Intestinal villus structure contributes to even shedding of epithelial cells.Biophysical journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Centre-based or cell-centre models are a framework for the computational study of multicellular systems with widespread use in cancer modelling and computational developmental biology. At the core of these models are the numerical method used to update cell positions and the force functions that encode the pairwise mechanical interactions of cells. For the latter, there are multiple choices that could potentially affect both the biological behaviour captured, and the robustness and efficiency of simulation. For example, available open-source software implementations of centre-based models rely on different force functions for their default behaviour and it is not straightforward for a modeller to know if these are interchangeable. Our study addresses this problem and contributes to the understanding of the potential and limitations of three popular force functions from a numerical perspective. We show empirically that choosing the force parameters such that the relaxation time for two cells after cell division is consistent between different force functions results in good agreement of the population radius of a two-dimensional monolayer relaxing mechanically after intense cell proliferation. Furthermore, we report that numerical stability is not sufficient to prevent unphysical cell trajectories following cell division, and consequently, that too large time steps can cause geometrical differences at the population level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.