Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33025278›Full record

ArticleBulletin of mathematical biology2020

Impact of Force Function Formulations on the Numerical Simulation of Centre-Based Models.

Sonja Mathias, Adrien Coulier, Anass Bouchnita, Andreas Hellander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of mathematical biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sonja MathiasDepartment of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. sonja.mathias@it.uu.se.ORCID 0000-0003-3682-7715
Adrien CoulierDepartment of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anass BouchnitaDepartment of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2729-6484
Andreas HellanderDepartment of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7273-7923

Funding

Vetenskapsrådet 2015-03964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Centre-based or cell-centre models are a framework for the computational study of multicellular systems with widespread use in cancer modelling and computational developmental biology. At the core of these models are the numerical method used to update cell positions and the force functions that encode the pairwise mechanical interactions of cells. For the latter, there are multiple choices that could potentially affect both the biological behaviour captured, and the robustness and efficiency of simulation. For example, available open-source software implementations of centre-based models rely on different force functions for their default behaviour and it is not straightforward for a modeller to know if these are interchangeable. Our study addresses this problem and contributes to the understanding of the potential and limitations of three popular force functions from a numerical perspective. We show empirically that choosing the force parameters such that the relaxation time for two cells after cell division is consistent between different force functions results in good agreement of the population radius of a two-dimensional monolayer relaxing mechanically after intense cell proliferation. Furthermore, we report that numerical stability is not sufficient to prevent unphysical cell trajectories following cell division, and consequently, that too large time steps can cause geometrical differences at the population level.

Indexed as

Cell Physiological PhenomenaComputer SimulationModels, BiologicalCell DivisionCell ProliferationCell ShapeMathematical ConceptsNeoplasmsCell-based modelForce functionMonolayer growthNumerical method

Identifiers

PMID33025278
PMCPMC7538447

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.