Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33025385›Full record

ReviewReviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders2021

Expected and paradoxical effects of obesity on cancer treatment response.

Marco Gallo, Valerio Adinolfi, Viola Barucca, Natalie Prinzi, Valerio Renzelli, Luigi Barrea, Paola Di Giacinto, Rosaria Maddalena Ruggeri, Franz Sesti, Emanuela Arvat and 23 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Sarcopenic obesity in cancer.Radiology and oncology · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Marco GalloOncological Endocrinology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Via Genova, 3, 10126, Turin, Italy. mgallo4@cittadellasalute.to.it.
Valerio AdinolfiEndocrinology and Diabetology Unit, ASL Verbano Cusio Ossola, Domodossola, Italy.
Viola BaruccaOncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Medical Specialities, AO San Camillo-Forlanini, Rome, Italy.
Natalie PrinziENETS Center of Excellence, Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori Milano, Milan, Italy.
Valerio RenzelliDepartment of Experimental Medicine, AO S. Andrea, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Luigi BarreaEndocrinology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Medical School of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Paola Di GiacintoEndocrinology Unit, Department of Oncology and Medical Specialities, AO San Camillo-Forlanini, Rome, Italy.
Rosaria Maddalena RuggeriEndocrine Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, AOU Policlinico G. Martino, Messina, Italy.
Franz SestiDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Emanuela ArvatOncological Endocrinology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Via Genova, 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Roberto BaldelliEndocrinology Unit, Department of Oncology and Medical Specialities, AO San Camillo-Forlanini, Rome, Italy.
EOLO Group
Emanuela Arvat
Annamaria Colao
Andrea Isidori
Andrea Lenzi
Roberto Baldell
M Albertelli
D Attala
A Bianchi
A Di Sarno
T Feola
G Mazziotti
A Nervo
C Pozza
G Puliani
P Razzore
S Ramponi
S Ricciardi
L Rizza
F Rota
E Sbardella
M C Zatelli
Sapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Messina · ITUniversity of Turin · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · ITAzienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini · ITFederico II University Hospital · ITFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obesity, whose prevalence is pandemic and continuing to increase, is a major preventable and modifiable risk factor for diabetes and cardiovascular diseases, as well as for cancer. Furthermore, epidemiological studies have shown that obesity is a negative independent prognostic factor for several oncological outcomes, including overall and cancer-specific survival, for several site-specific cancers as well as for all cancers combined. Yet, a recently growing body of evidence suggests that sometimes overweight and obesity may associate with better outcomes, and that immunotherapy may show improved response among obese patients compared with patients with a normal weight. The so-called 'obesity paradox' has been reported in several advanced cancer as well as in other diseases, albeit the mechanisms behind this unexpected relationship are still not clear. Aim of this review is to explore the expected as well as the paradoxical relationship between obesity and cancer prognosis, with a particular emphasis on the effects of cancer therapies in obese people.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesNeoplasmsBody Mass IndexHumansObesityOverweightPrognosisRisk FactorsBody mass indexCancerCancer therapyObesityOverweightTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID33025385
OpenAlexW3092229847

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.