Trial reportPhysiological reports2020
Circulating lipids in men with type 2 diabetes following 3 days on a carbohydrate-free diet versus 3 days of fasting.
Trial report in Physiological reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Duration-dependent effects of water-only fasting on blood lipids: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and threshold meta-regression.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Circulating lipids in men with type 2 diabetes following 3 days on a carbohydrate-free diet versus 3 days of fasting.Physiological reports · 2020Trial
- β‑hydroxybutyric acid as a potential therapeutic metabolite for type 2 diabetes mellitus (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Ketone Bodies as Metabolites and Signalling Molecules at the Crossroad between Inflammation and Epigenetic Control of Cardiometabolic Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe have been interested in determining the effects of dietary changes on fuel metabolism and regulation in men with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In this study, the changes in 24-hr circulating lipid profiles were determined when the major fuel source was endogenous versus exogenous fat.
methodsSeven males with T2DM were randomized in a crossover design with a 4-week washout period. A standard mixed (control) diet (30%fat:15%protein:55%carbohydrate) was provided initially. Subsequently, a 72-hr (3-day) fast, or a high fat (85%), 15% protein, essentially carbohydrate-free (CHO-free) diet was provided for 72 hr. Triacylglycerol (TAG), non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA), β-hydroxybutyrate (bHB), and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) profiles were determined during the last 24 hr of intervention, as well as during the control diet.
resultsRegardless of the amount of dietary fat (30% vs 85%) and differences in 24-hr profiles, TAG, NEFA, and bHB all returned to the previous basal concentrations within 24 hr. TAGs and NEFAs changed only modestly with fasting; bHB was elevated and increasing. The IGFBP-1 profile was essentially unchanged with either diet but increased with fasting.
conclusionA CHO-free diet resulted in a large increase in TAG and NEFA versus the control diet; however, both were cleared by the following morning. A negative NEFA profile occurred with the control diet. Thus, mechanisms are present to restore lipid concentrations to their original AM concentrations daily. Fasting resulted in stable concentrations, except for a continuing increase in bHB. Glucose and insulin, common fuel regulators, could not explain the results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.