Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33032519›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2020

Development and comparison of RNA-sequencing pipelines for more accurate SNP identification: practical example of functional SNP detection associated with feed efficiency in Nellore beef cattle.

S Lam, J Zeidan, F Miglior, A Suárez-Vega, I Gómez-Redondo, P A S Fonseca, L L Guan, S Waters, A Cánovas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Skeletal Muscle Expression of Actinin-3 (Frontiers in genetics · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

S LamCentre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E, Guelph, Ontario, N1G2W1, Canada.
J ZeidanCentre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E, Guelph, Ontario, N1G2W1, Canada.
F MigliorCentre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E, Guelph, Ontario, N1G2W1, Canada.
A Suárez-VegaCentre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E, Guelph, Ontario, N1G2W1, Canada.
I Gómez-RedondoCentre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E, Guelph, Ontario, N1G2W1, Canada.
P A S FonsecaCentre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E, Guelph, Ontario, N1G2W1, Canada.
L L GuanDepartment of Agriculture, Food & Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6H 2P5, Canada.
S WatersTeagasc, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Grange, Dunsany, Co. Meath, C15 PW93, Ireland.
A CánovasCentre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E, Guelph, Ontario, N1G2W1, Canada. acanovas@uoguelph.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0036-0757
University of Guelph · CAInstitute of Agrifood Research and Technology · ESTeagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority · IEUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

Genome Canada and Genome Ontario NoneOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA) NoneSustainable Beef and Forage Science Cluster funded by the Canadian Beef Cattle Check-Off, Beef Cattle Research Council (BCRC), Alberta Beef Producers, Alberta Cattle Feeders' Association, Beef Farmers of Ontario, La Fédération des Productuers de bovins du FDE.13.17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOptimization of an RNA-Sequencing (RNA-Seq) pipeline is critical to maximize power and accuracy to identify genetic variants, including SNPs, which may serve as genetic markers to select for feed efficiency, leading to economic benefits for beef production. This study used RNA-Seq data (GEO Accession ID: PRJEB7696 and PRJEB15314) from muscle and liver tissue, respectively, from 12 Nellore beef steers selected from 585 steers with residual feed intake measures (RFI; n = 6 low-RFI, n = 6 high-RFI). Three RNA-Seq pipelines were compared including multi-sample calling from i) non-merged samples; ii) merged samples by RFI group, iii) merged samples by RFI and tissue group. The RNA-Seq reads were aligned against the UMD3.1 bovine reference genome (release 94) assembly using STAR aligner. Variants were called using BCFtools and variant effect prediction (VeP) and functional annotation (ToppGene) analyses were performed.

resultsOn average, total reads detected for Approach i) non-merged samples for liver and muscle, were 18,362,086.3 and 35,645,898.7, respectively. For Approach ii), merging samples by RFI group, total reads detected for each merged group was 162,030,705, and for Approach iii), merging samples by RFI group and tissues, was 324,061,410, revealing the highest read depth for Approach iii). Additionally, Approach iii) merging samples by RFI group and tissues, revealed the highest read depth per variant coverage (572.59 ± 3993.11) and encompassed the majority of localized positional genes detected by each approach. This suggests Approach iii) had optimized detection power, read depth, and accuracy of SNP calling, therefore increasing confidence of variant detection and reducing false positive detection. Approach iii) was then used to detect unique SNPs fixed within low- (12,145) and high-RFI (14,663) groups. Functional annotation of SNPs revealed positional candidate genes, for each RFI group (2886 for low-RFI, 3075 for high-RFI), which were significantly (P < 0.05) associated with immune and metabolic pathways.

conclusionThe most optimized RNA-Seq pipeline allowed for more accurate identification of SNPs, associated positional candidate genes, and significantly associated metabolic pathways in muscle and liver tissues, providing insight on the underlying genetic architecture of feed efficiency in beef cattle.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, RNAAnimalsCattleBovineFeed efficiencyRNA-SeqSingle nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)Transcriptomics

Identifiers

PMID33032519
PMCPMC7545862
OpenAlexW3092569793

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.