ArticleBMC genomics2020
Development and comparison of RNA-sequencing pipelines for more accurate SNP identification: practical example of functional SNP detection associated with feed efficiency in Nellore beef cattle.
Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcriptome-derived variants in milk reveal host response signatures to subclinical intramammary infection in Holstein cattle.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Whole-transcriptome identification of deleterious variants in candidate genes linked to bovine paratuberculosis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Sheep Genetic Resistance to Gastrointestinal Nematode Infections: Current Insights from Transcriptomics and Other OMICs Technologies-A Review.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Exploratory identification of coding and splicing-related SNV variants in A1A1 and A2A2 β-casein Holstein dairy cows.Journal of animal science · 2026Article
- Uncovering functional INDELs responsible for splice sites in sheep with different immune profiles naturally exposed to gastrointestinal nematode infection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Single-variant genome-wide association study and regional heritability mapping of protein efficiency and performance traits in Large White pigs.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2025Article
- Insights into garlic (Allium Sativum)'s nutrigenomics-associated fly-repellent potency in cattle.Tropical animal health and production · 2025Review
- Article
- Robust identification of regulatory variants (eQTLs) using a differential expression framework developed for RNA-sequencing.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Transcriptome Profile in Dairy Cows Resistant or Sensitive to Milk Fat Depression.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Identification of novel alternative splicing associated with mastitis disease in Holstein dairy cows using large gap read mapping.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Bulked Segregant RNA Sequencing Revealed Difference Between Virulent and Avirulent Brown Planthoppers.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Skeletal Muscle Expression of Actinin-3 (Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- The potential for mitigation of methane emissions in ruminants through the application of metagenomics, metabolomics, and other -OMICS technologies.Journal of animal science · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOptimization of an RNA-Sequencing (RNA-Seq) pipeline is critical to maximize power and accuracy to identify genetic variants, including SNPs, which may serve as genetic markers to select for feed efficiency, leading to economic benefits for beef production. This study used RNA-Seq data (GEO Accession ID: PRJEB7696 and PRJEB15314) from muscle and liver tissue, respectively, from 12 Nellore beef steers selected from 585 steers with residual feed intake measures (RFI; n = 6 low-RFI, n = 6 high-RFI). Three RNA-Seq pipelines were compared including multi-sample calling from i) non-merged samples; ii) merged samples by RFI group, iii) merged samples by RFI and tissue group. The RNA-Seq reads were aligned against the UMD3.1 bovine reference genome (release 94) assembly using STAR aligner. Variants were called using BCFtools and variant effect prediction (VeP) and functional annotation (ToppGene) analyses were performed.
resultsOn average, total reads detected for Approach i) non-merged samples for liver and muscle, were 18,362,086.3 and 35,645,898.7, respectively. For Approach ii), merging samples by RFI group, total reads detected for each merged group was 162,030,705, and for Approach iii), merging samples by RFI group and tissues, was 324,061,410, revealing the highest read depth for Approach iii). Additionally, Approach iii) merging samples by RFI group and tissues, revealed the highest read depth per variant coverage (572.59 ± 3993.11) and encompassed the majority of localized positional genes detected by each approach. This suggests Approach iii) had optimized detection power, read depth, and accuracy of SNP calling, therefore increasing confidence of variant detection and reducing false positive detection. Approach iii) was then used to detect unique SNPs fixed within low- (12,145) and high-RFI (14,663) groups. Functional annotation of SNPs revealed positional candidate genes, for each RFI group (2886 for low-RFI, 3075 for high-RFI), which were significantly (P < 0.05) associated with immune and metabolic pathways.
conclusionThe most optimized RNA-Seq pipeline allowed for more accurate identification of SNPs, associated positional candidate genes, and significantly associated metabolic pathways in muscle and liver tissues, providing insight on the underlying genetic architecture of feed efficiency in beef cattle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.