Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33033168›Full record

Observational studyJournal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry2020

Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in obsessive-compulsives disorders: long-term follow-up of an open, prospective, observational cohort.

Stephan Chabardes, Paul Krack, Brigitte Piallat, Thierry Bougerol, Eric Seigneuret, Jerome Yelnik, Sara Fernandez Vidal, Olivier David, Luc Mallet, Alim-Louis Benabid and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. A Multi-Symptom Circuit Architecture of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Stephan ChabardesCLINATEC, CEA Clinatec-Minatec, Grenoble, France schabardes@chu-grenoble.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-7930-1476
Paul KrackDivision of Neurology, Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland, Bern, Switzerland.
Brigitte PiallatGrenoble Institut neurosciences, University Grenoble Alpes-INSERM U1216, 38000 Grenoble, France.
Thierry BougerolDepartment of Psychiatry, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Eric SeigneuretDepartment of Neurosurgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Jerome YelnikInstitut du Cerveau, ICM, Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, F-75013, Paris, France.
Sara Fernandez VidalInstitut du Cerveau, ICM, Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, F-75013, Paris, France.
Olivier DavidGrenoble Institut neurosciences, University Grenoble Alpes-INSERM U1216, 38000 Grenoble, France.
Luc MalletInstitut du Cerveau, ICM, Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, F-75013, Paris, France.
Alim-Louis BenabidCLINATEC, CEA Clinatec-Minatec, Grenoble, France.
Mircea PolosanGrenoble Institut neurosciences, University Grenoble Alpes-INSERM U1216, 38000 Grenoble, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FRInserm · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut polytechnique de Grenoble · FRUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a major cause of disability in western country and responsible for severe impairment of quality of life. About 10% of patients present with severe OCD symptoms and require innovative treatment such as deep brain stimulation (DBS). Among possible targets, the non-motor subthalamic nucleus (STN) is a key node of the basal ganglia circuitry, strongly connected to limbic cortical areas known to be involved in OCD.

methodWe analysed, in a prospective, observational, monocentric, open label cohort, the effect of chronic non-motor STN-DBS in 19 patients with treatment-resistant OCD consecutively operated in a single centre. Severity of OCD was evaluated using the Yale and Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS). YBOCS scores at 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively were compared with baseline. Responders were defined by >35% improvement of YBOCS scores. Global Assessment Functioning (GAF) scale was used to evaluate the impact of improvement.

resultsAt a 24-month follow-up, the mean YBOCS score improved by 53.4% from 33.3±3.5 to 15.8±9.1 (95% CI 11.2-20.4; p<0.0001). Fourteen out of 19 patients were considered as responders, 5 out of 19 being improved over 75% and 10 out of 19 over 50%. GAF scale improved by 92% from 34.1±3.9 to 66.4±18.8 (95% CI 56.7-76.1; p=0.0003). The most frequent adverse events consisted of transient DBS-induced hypomania and anxiety.

conclusionChronic DBS of the non-motor STN is an effective and relatively safe procedure to treat severe OCD resistant to conventional management.

Indexed as

Subthalamic NucleusAdultAnxietyCohort StudiesDeep Brain StimulationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleManiaMiddle AgedObsessive-Compulsive DisorderProspective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID33033168
PMCPMC7677463
OpenAlexW3092146188

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.