Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33036605›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Implementation of guidelines on family involvement for persons with psychotic disorders in community mental health centres (IFIP): protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Lars Hestmark, Maria Romøren, Kristin Sverdvik Heiervang, Bente Weimand, Torleif Ruud, Reidun Norvoll, Kristiane Myckland Hansson, Irene Norheim, Eline Aas, Elisabeth Geke Marjan Landeweer and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03869177 (Implementation of Guidelines on Family Involvement for Persons With Psychotic Disorders in Community Mental Health Centres. A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial.), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03869177 nacompletednot on this map

Implementation of Guidelines on Family Involvement for Persons With Psychotic Disorders in Community Mental Health Centres. A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OsloRan2019 to 2022Enrolled460ConditionsPsychotic DisordersArmsImplementation support program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Family therapy for persons with schizophrenia: neglected yet important.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lars HestmarkCentre for Medical Ethics, University of Oslo, Kirkeveien 166 Fredrik Holsts hus, 0450, Oslo, Norway. lars.hestmark@medisin.uio.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3249-0118
Maria RomørenCentre for Medical Ethics, University of Oslo, Kirkeveien 166 Fredrik Holsts hus, 0450, Oslo, Norway.
Kristin Sverdvik HeiervangCentre for Medical Ethics, University of Oslo, Kirkeveien 166 Fredrik Holsts hus, 0450, Oslo, Norway.
Bente WeimandDivision of Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Sykehusveien 25, 1474, Nordbyhagen, Norway.
Torleif RuudCentre for Medical Ethics, University of Oslo, Kirkeveien 166 Fredrik Holsts hus, 0450, Oslo, Norway.
Reidun NorvollWork Research Institute, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Kristiane Myckland HanssonCentre for Medical Ethics, University of Oslo, Kirkeveien 166 Fredrik Holsts hus, 0450, Oslo, Norway.
Irene NorheimDivision of Mental Health and Addiction, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Lier, Norway.
Eline AasDepartment of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Elisabeth Geke Marjan LandeweerCentre for Medical Ethics, University of Oslo, Kirkeveien 166 Fredrik Holsts hus, 0450, Oslo, Norway.
Reidar PedersenCentre for Medical Ethics, University of Oslo, Kirkeveien 166 Fredrik Holsts hus, 0450, Oslo, Norway.
University of Oslo · NOOsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University · NOUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLVestre Viken Hospital Trust · NO

Funding

Norges Forskningsråd NFR 262863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamily involvement for persons with psychotic disorders is under-implemented in mental health care, despite its firm scientific, economic, legal and moral basis. This appears to be the case in Norway, despite the presence of national guidelines providing both general recommendations on family involvement and support in the health- and care services, and specific guidance on family interventions for patients with psychotic disorders. The aim of this project is to improve mental health services and the psychosocial health of persons with psychotic disorders and their relatives, by implementing selected recommendations from the national guidelines in community mental health centres, and to evaluate this process.

methodsThe trial is cluster randomised, where 14 outpatient clusters from community mental health centres undergo stratified randomisation with an allocation ratio of 1:1. The seven intervention clusters will receive implementation support for 18 months, whereas the control clusters will receive the same support after this implementation period. The intervention consists of: 1. A basic level of family involvement and support. 2. Family psychoeducation in single-family groups. 3. Training and guidance of health care personnel. 4. A family coordinator and 5. Other implementation measures. Fidelity to the intervention will be measured four times in the intervention arm and two times in the control arm, and the differences in fidelity changes between the arms constitute the primary outcomes. In each arm, we aim to include 161 patients with psychotic disorders and their closest relative to fill in questionnaires at inclusion, 6 months and 12 months, measuring psychosocial health and satisfaction with services. Clinicians will contribute clinical data about patients at inclusion and 12 months. Use of health and welfare services and work participation, for both patients and relatives, will be retrieved from national registries. We will also perform qualitative interviews with patients, relatives, health care personnel and leaders. Finally, we will conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis and a political economy analysis. DISCUSSION: This project, with its multilevel and mixed methods approach, may contribute valuable knowledge to the fields of family involvement, mental health service research and implementation science.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03869177 . Registered 11.03.19.

Indexed as

Community Mental Health CentersFamilyPractice Guidelines as TopicPsychotic DisordersHumansNorwayRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicClinical ethicsFamily interventionFamily involvementFamily psychoeducationImplementationMental health service researchPsychotic disordersSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID33036605
PMCPMC7547488
OpenAlexW3092093798

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.