Evidence mapPaperPMID 33037036Full record

Trial reportBMJ open diabetes research & care2020

Further improvement in glycemic control after switching from exenatide two times per day to exenatide once-weekly autoinjected suspension in patients with type 2 diabetes: 52-week results from the DURATION-NEO-1 study.

Carol H Wysham, Julio Rosenstock, Marion L Vetter, Hui Wang, Elise Hardy, Nayyar Iqbal

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01652716 (A Randomized, Open-Label, Long-Term, Parallel-Group, Comparator-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Compare the Glycemic Effects, Safety, and Tolerability of Exenatide Once Weekly Suspension to Exenatide Twice Daily in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01652716 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Open-Label, Long-Term, Parallel-Group, Comparator-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Compare the Glycemic Effects, Safety, and Tolerability of Exenatide Once Weekly Suspension to Exenatide Twice Daily in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

TypeinterventionalSponsorAstraZenecaRan2013 to 2014Enrolled377ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsExenatide once weekly suspension, Exenatide twice daily
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Carol H WyshamSection of Endocrinology and Metabolism, MultiCare Rockwood Clinic, Spokane, Washington, USA cwysham@multicare.org.ORCID 0000-0002-3056-0047
Julio RosenstockDallas Diabetes Research Center at Medical City, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Marion L VetterBristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Hui WangAstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
Elise HardyLate clinical development, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
Nayyar IqbalClinical, Diabetes, Metabolism and GI, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
AstraZeneca (United States) · USBristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · USDallas Diabetes Research Center · USRockwood Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInvestigate the effects of switching from two times per day exenatide to once-weekly exenatide administered by autoinjector (exenatide once-weekly suspension by autoinjector (QWS-AI)) or treatment with exenatide QWS-AI for 1 year. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsIn this phase III open-label study, adults with type 2 diabetes were randomized to receive exenatide QWS-AI (2 mg) or exenatide two times per day (5 mcg for 4 weeks, followed by 10 mcg) for 28 weeks. During a subsequent non-randomized 24-week extension, patients who received exenatide two times per day were switched to exenatide QWS-AI and those randomized to exenatide QWS-AI continued this treatment. Efficacy measures included changes from baseline in glycated hemoglobin (A1C), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and body weight.

resultsIn total, 315 patients (mean baseline A1C of 8.5%) completed the initial 28 weeks of randomized treatment with exenatide QWS-AI (n=197) or exenatide two times per day (n=118) and were included in the 24-week extension (mean A1C of 7.0% and 7.3%, respectively, at week 28). From weeks 28-52, patients who switched from exenatide two times per day to exenatide QWS-AI had additional A1C reductions of approximately 0.5% (mean A1C change from baseline of -1.4% at week 52) and further reductions from baseline in FPG. Patients who continued exenatide QWS-AI treatment for 52 weeks showed clinically relevant A1C reductions (mean A1C change from baseline of -1.3% at week 52). Body-weight reductions achieved through week 28 were sustained at week 52 in both groups. There were no unexpected safety concerns or changes in the safety profile among patients who switched from exenatide two times per day to exenatide QWS-AI or those who continued exenatide QWS-AI treatment for 52 weeks.

conclusionsSwitching from exenatide two times per day to exenatide QWS-AI resulted in further A1C reductions and maintenance of earlier decreases in body weight, while continued therapy with exenatide QWS-AI for 52 weeks maintained A1C and body-weight reductions, without additional safety or tolerability concerns. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01652716.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2AdultExenatideGlycemic ControlHumansHypoglycemic AgentsPeptidesVenomsExenatideHypoglycemic AgentsPeptidesVenomsGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1)glycemic controltype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID33037036
PMCPMC7549491
OpenAlexW3092463639

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.