Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33037196›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Reconstructing the maize leaf regulatory network using ChIP-seq data of 104 transcription factors.

Xiaoyu Tu, María Katherine Mejía-Guerra, Jose A Valdes Franco, David Tzeng, Po-Yu Chu, Wei Shen, Yingying Wei, Xiuru Dai, Pinghua Li, Edward S Buckler and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 114 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
114citing papers in PubMed
36.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

114 citing papers in PubMed, 234 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. From Structure to Function of Promoters and 5'UTRs in Maize.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Xiaoyu Tu *The State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Shandong, China.
María Katherine Mejía-Guerra *Institute for Genomic Diversity, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. mm2842@cornell.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2791-182X
Jose A Valdes FrancoInstitute for Genomic Diversity, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0887-5827
David TzengState Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Po-Yu ChuState Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Wei ShenState Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Yingying WeiDepartment of Statistics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Xiuru DaiThe State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Shandong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2516-1068
Pinghua LiThe State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Shandong, China. pinghuali@sdau.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4314-7400
Edward S BucklerInstitute for Genomic Diversity, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3100-371X
Silin ZhongState Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. silin.zhong@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0198-7383
Chinese University of Hong Kong · HKCornell University · USShandong Agricultural University · CNAgricultural Research Service · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transcription regulatory network inside a eukaryotic cell is defined by the combinatorial actions of transcription factors (TFs). However, TF binding studies in plants are too few in number to produce a general picture of this complex network. In this study, we use large-scale ChIP-seq to reconstruct it in the maize leaf, and train machine-learning models to predict TF binding and co-localization. The resulting network covers 77% of the expressed genes, and shows a scale-free topology and functional modularity like a real-world network. TF binding sequence preferences are conserved within family, while co-binding could be key for their binding specificity. Cross-species comparison shows that core network nodes at the top of the transmission of information being more conserved than those at the bottom. This study reveals the complex and redundant nature of the plant transcription regulatory network, and sheds light on its architecture, organizing principle and evolutionary trajectory.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksChromatin Immunoprecipitation SequencingComputational BiologyMachine LearningPlant LeavesPlant ProteinsPoaceaeTranscription FactorsZea maysPlant ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID33037196
PMCPMC7547689
OpenAlexW3092370645

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.