Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33050302›Full record

ReviewJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Novel Antifungal Agents and Their Activity against

Roya Vahedi-Shahandashti, Cornelia Lass-Flörl

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Antifungal susceptibility ofFrontiers in public health · 2026
    Article
  4. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. DecipheringMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Current Perspectives of Antifungal Therapy: A Special Focus onJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Novel Antifungals andJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. A Cecropin-4 Derived Peptide C18 InhibitsFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Roya Vahedi-ShahandashtiInstitute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Medical University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Cornelia Lass-FlörlInstitute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Medical University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2946-7785

Funding

Austrian Science Fund W1253-B24 doctoral program HOROSAustrian Science Fund FWF W 1253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a need for new antifungal agents, mainly due to increased incidence of invasive fungal infections (IFI), high frequency of associated morbidity and mortality and limitations of the current antifungal agents (e.g., toxicity, drug-drug interactions, and resistance). The clinically available antifungals for IFI are restricted to four main classes: polyenes, flucytosine, triazoles, and echinocandins. Several antifungals are hampered by multiple resistance mechanisms being present in fungi. Consequently, novel antifungal agents with new targets and modified chemical structures are required to combat fungal infections. This review will describe novel antifungals, with a focus on the

Indexed as

aspergillosisinvasive fungal infectionsnew therapiesnovel antifungal drugs

Identifiers

PMID33050302
PMCPMC7711508

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.