Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33057419›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Whole transcriptomic network analysis using Co-expression Differential Network Analysis (CoDiNA).

Deisy Morselli Gysi, Tiago de Miranda Fragoso, Fatemeh Zebardast, Wesley Bertoli, Volker Busskamp, Eivind Almaas, Katja Nowick

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Deisy Morselli GysiDepartment of Computer Science, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5771-8182
Tiago de Miranda FragosoFundação Cesgranrio, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Fatemeh ZebardastDepartment of Biology, Chemistry, Pharmacy, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Wesley BertoliDepartment of Statistics, Federal University of Technology - Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Volker BusskampCenter for Regenerative Therapies (CRTD), Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Eivind AlmaasDepartment of Biotechnology, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9125-326X
Katja NowickDepartment of Biology, Chemistry, Pharmacy, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Freie Universität Berlin · DEFundação Cesgranrio · BRLeipzig University · DENorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOUniversidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná · BRUniversity of Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological and medical sciences are increasingly acknowledging the significance of gene co-expression-networks for investigating complex-systems, phenotypes or diseases. Typically, complex phenotypes are investigated under varying conditions. While approaches for comparing nodes and links in two networks exist, almost no methods for the comparison of multiple networks are available and-to best of our knowledge-no comparative method allows for whole transcriptomic network analysis. However, it is the aim of many studies to compare networks of different conditions, for example, tissues, diseases, treatments, time points, or species. Here we present a method for the systematic comparison of an unlimited number of networks, with unlimited number of transcripts: Co-expression Differential Network Analysis (CoDiNA). In particular, CoDiNA detects links and nodes that are common, specific or different among the networks. We developed a statistical framework to normalize between these different categories of common or changed network links and nodes, resulting in a comprehensive network analysis method, more sophisticated than simply comparing the presence or absence of network nodes. Applying CoDiNA to a neurogenesis study we identified candidate genes involved in neuronal differentiation. We experimentally validated one candidate, demonstrating that its overexpression resulted in a significant disturbance in the underlying gene regulatory network of neurogenesis. Using clinical studies, we compared whole transcriptome co-expression networks from individuals with or without HIV and active tuberculosis (TB) and detected signature genes specific to HIV. Furthermore, analyzing multiple cancer transcription factor (TF) networks, we identified common and distinct features for particular cancer types. These CoDiNA applications demonstrate the successful detection of genes associated with specific phenotypes. Moreover, CoDiNA can also be used for comparing other types of undirected networks, for example, metabolic, protein-protein interaction, ecological and psychometric networks. CoDiNA is publicly available as an R package in CRAN (https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=CoDiNA).

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationGene Regulatory NetworksSoftwareTranscriptomeAlgorithmsHIVHIV InfectionsHumansNeoplasmsNeurogenesisNeuronsPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID33057419
PMCPMC7561188
OpenAlexW3093363401

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.