ArticlePloS one2020
Whole transcriptomic network analysis using Co-expression Differential Network Analysis (CoDiNA).
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrative gene co-expression network analysis reveals protein-coding and LncRNA genes associated with Alzheimer's disease pathology.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of ruminal and fecal microbiomes in Holstein, Jersey, and Jeju Black cattle using multiple taxonomic classifiers.Animal biotechnology · 2025Article
- Article
- Patient-specific gene co-expression networks reveal novel subtypes and predictive biomarkers in lung adenocarcinoma.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025Article
- A collaborative network analysis for the interpretation of transcriptomics data in Huntington's disease.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Microbial inoculum effects on the rumen epithelial transcriptome and rumen epimural metatranscriptome in calves.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Current and future directions in network biology.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
- Obese dogs exhibit different fecal microbiome and specific microbial networks compared with normal weight dogs.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- scGENA: A Single-Cell Gene Coexpression Network Analysis Framework for Clustering Cell Types and Revealing Biological Mechanisms.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- csdR, an R package for differential co-expression analysis.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Re-wiring and gene expression changes of AC025034.1 and ATP2B1 play complex roles in early-to-late breast cancer progression.BMC genomic data · 2022Article
- GWENA: gene co-expression networks analysis and extended modules characterization in a single Bioconductor package.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biological and medical sciences are increasingly acknowledging the significance of gene co-expression-networks for investigating complex-systems, phenotypes or diseases. Typically, complex phenotypes are investigated under varying conditions. While approaches for comparing nodes and links in two networks exist, almost no methods for the comparison of multiple networks are available and-to best of our knowledge-no comparative method allows for whole transcriptomic network analysis. However, it is the aim of many studies to compare networks of different conditions, for example, tissues, diseases, treatments, time points, or species. Here we present a method for the systematic comparison of an unlimited number of networks, with unlimited number of transcripts: Co-expression Differential Network Analysis (CoDiNA). In particular, CoDiNA detects links and nodes that are common, specific or different among the networks. We developed a statistical framework to normalize between these different categories of common or changed network links and nodes, resulting in a comprehensive network analysis method, more sophisticated than simply comparing the presence or absence of network nodes. Applying CoDiNA to a neurogenesis study we identified candidate genes involved in neuronal differentiation. We experimentally validated one candidate, demonstrating that its overexpression resulted in a significant disturbance in the underlying gene regulatory network of neurogenesis. Using clinical studies, we compared whole transcriptome co-expression networks from individuals with or without HIV and active tuberculosis (TB) and detected signature genes specific to HIV. Furthermore, analyzing multiple cancer transcription factor (TF) networks, we identified common and distinct features for particular cancer types. These CoDiNA applications demonstrate the successful detection of genes associated with specific phenotypes. Moreover, CoDiNA can also be used for comparing other types of undirected networks, for example, metabolic, protein-protein interaction, ecological and psychometric networks. CoDiNA is publicly available as an R package in CRAN (https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=CoDiNA).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.