Evidence mapPaperPMID 33063145Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2021

Differences in men and women suffering from CRSwNP and AERD in quality of life.

Tina J Bartosik, David T Liu, Nicholas J Campion, Sergio Villazala-Merino, Stefan Janik, Valerie Dahm, Christian A Mueller, Erich Vyskocil, Victoria Stanek, Tamara Quint and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tina J BartosikDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6326-7402
David T LiuDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6948-737X
Nicholas J CampionDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Sergio Villazala-MerinoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Stefan JanikDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Valerie DahmDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Christian A MuellerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Erich VyskocilDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Victoria StanekDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Tamara QuintDepartment of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Christine BangertDepartment of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Julia Eckl-DornaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. julia.eckl-dorna@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5981-1607
Sven SchneiderDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWhile the overall impact of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) on patients' health is diverse, many affected individuals have a substantially impaired quality of life (QoL). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of sex-associated differences specifically in the subgroups of CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) by assessing QoL parameters in women and men separately.

methodsIn a retrospective single-center study, 59 patients with CRSwNP (39 males and 20 females) and 46 patients with AERD (18 males and 28 females) were included. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) evaluating QoL via the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-20 German Adapted Version (SNOT-20 GAV) as well as the total polyp score (TPS) were analysed.

resultsThere was no significant difference in TPS (p = 0.5550) and total SNOT-20 GAV scores (p = 0.0726) between male or female patients with CRSwNP or AERD. Furthermore, no significant sex differences were found within disease groups regarding the subcategories of the SNOT-20 GAV items.

conclusionThus, quality of life is severely impaired in patients suffering from various forms of CRS regardless of their sex.

Indexed as

Asthma, Aspirin-InducedNasal PolypsRhinitisSinusitisChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesAERDAspirin-exacerbated respiratory diseaseChronic rhinosinusitisPolypsSamter’s triadSexSNOT-20 GAV

Identifiers

PMID33063145
PMCPMC8057986
OpenAlexW3093410353

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.