Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33065106›Full record

ReviewChest2021

Preventing COPD Readmissions Under the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program: How Far Have We Come?

Valerie G Press, Laura C Myers, Laura C Feemster

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chest, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Implementing acute exacerbations of COPD care bundles: evidence, effectiveness and future directions.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Valerie G PressSection of General Internal Medicine University of Chicago Medicine. Electronic address: vpress@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu.
Laura C MyersDivisions of Research and Pulmonary/Critical Care Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Northern California.
Laura C FeemsterDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, VA Puget Sound Health Care System.
Kaiser Permanente · USUniversity of Chicago · USVA Puget Sound Health Care System · US

Funding

Research Design, Data, and Analytics CoreP30DK092949 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI MILDA Renne SAUNDERS · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
The Virtual Mentored Implementation to Reduce REVISITS (Reducing Respiratory Emergent Visits using Implementation Science Interventions Tailored to Setting) StudyR01HL146644 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI PRESS, VALERIE G · 2020 to 2024
$3.9M
Bringing Respiratory Education for improved Adherence and Technique Home through E-interventions for Self-management (BREATHES) ProgramR03HL144883 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI PRESS, VALERIE G · 2018 to 2019
$162k
post-REcovery LIbEration From Oxygen in Exacerbated COPD (RELIEF)I01HX002499 · VA · VA PUGET SOUND HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI FEEMSTER, LAURA CECERE · 2019 to 2023
–
HSRD VA I01 HX002499NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL146644NHLBI NIH HHS R03 HL144883NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) was developed and implemented by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to curb the rate of 30-day hospital readmissions for certain common, high-impact conditions. In October 2014, COPD became a target condition for which hospitals were penalized for excess readmissions. The appropriateness, utility, and potential unintended consequences of the metric have been a topic of debate since it was first enacted. Nevertheless, there is evidence that hospital policies broadly implemented in response to the HRRP may have been responsible for reducing the rate of readmissions following COPD hospitalizations even before it was added as a target condition. Since the addition of the COPD condition to the HRRP, several predictive models have been developed to predict COPD survival and readmissions, with the intention of identifying modifiable risk factors. A number of interventions have also been studied, with mixed results. Bundled care interventions using the electronic health record and patient education interventions for inhaler education have been shown to reduce readmissions, whereas pulmonary rehabilitation, follow-up visits, and self-management programs have not been consistently shown to do the same. Through this program, COPD has become recognized as a public health priority. However, 5 years after COPD became a target condition for HRRP, there continues to be no single intervention that reliably prevents readmissions in this patient population. Further research is needed to understand the long-term effects of the policy, the role of competing risks in measuring quality, the optimal postdischarge care for patients with COPD, and the integrated use of predictive modeling and advanced technologies to prevent COPD readmissions.

Indexed as

Patient ReadmissionPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveContinuity of Patient CareHumansMedical OverusePatient Care BundlesPatient Education as TopicQuality ImprovementRisk FactorsCOPDHospital Readmission Reduction Programquality of carereadmissionstransitions of care

Identifiers

PMID33065106
PMCPMC8501005
OpenAlexW3093388879

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.