Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33068631›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology2020

Recovery of reward function in problematic substance users using a combination of robotics, electrophysiology, and TMS.

Kathryn Biernacki, Mei-Heng Lin, Travis E Baker

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kathryn BiernackiCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University-Newark, Newark, NJ 07102, United States of America.
Mei-Heng LinCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University-Newark, Newark, NJ 07102, United States of America.
Travis E BakerCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University-Newark, Newark, NJ 07102, United States of America. Electronic address: travis.e.baker@rutgers.edu.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Using combined EEG and non-invasive brain stimulation to examine and improve reward functioning in opioid use disorderR21DA049574 · NIDA · RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ NEWARK · PI BAKER, TRAVIS E. · 2020 to 2021
$439k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA049574
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTheoretical and empirical work suggest that addictive drugs potentiate dopaminergic reinforcement learning signals and disrupt the reward function of its neural targets, including the anterior midcingulate cortex (aMCC) and the basal ganglia. Here, we aim to use prefrontal 10-Hz TMS to enhance aMCC reward activity and reward learning by the basal ganglia in problematic substance users.

methods22 problematic substance users were randomized into an Active and SHAM (coil flipped) TMS group. We recorded the reward positivity-an electrophysiological signal believed to index sensitivity of the aMCC to rewards-while participants engaged in 4 blocks (100 trials per block) of a reward-based choice task. A robotic arm positioned a TMS coil over a prefrontal cortex target, and 50 pulses were delivered at 10-Hz before every 10 trials of blocks 2-4 (1500 pulses, 400 trials). Participants then completed a decision-making task that is diagnostic of striatal dopamine dysfunction.

resultsThe present study revealed three main findings. First, both groups failed to elicit a reward positivity during the first two task blocks. Second, applying robot-assisted TMS enhanced the amplitude of the reward positivity in the Active group, but not the SHAM group, across the last two task blocks. Third, the Active group performed relatively better at reward-based learning than the SHAM group.

conclusionThese results demonstrate that 10-Hz TMS is successful in modulating the reward function of the aMCC and basal ganglia in problematic substance users, which may have utility in the treatment of reward-related neural dysfunction commonly associated with substance use disorders.

Indexed as

RoboticsElectrophysiologyHumansPrefrontal CortexReinforcement, PsychologyRewardAnterior midcingulate cortexCognitive controlDecision-makingReward positivitySubstance use disorderTMS

Identifiers

PMID33068631
PMCPMC10353476
OpenAlexW3093198383

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.