ArticleTurkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology2020
Spinal versus general anesthesia in gynecologic laparoscopy: A prospective, randomized study.
Article in Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06710522 (COMPARISON OF OXIDANT-ANTIOXIDANT LEVELS WITH STRESS HORMONES IN SPINAL ANESTHESIA AND GENERAL ANESTHESIA IN LAPAROSCOPIC TUBE LIGATION), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of oxidant-antioxidant levels with stress hormones in spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia in laparoscopic tube ligation
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The impact of spinal versus general anesthesia on the variability of surgical times: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2025Pooled it
- Does Regional Anesthesia Improve Recovery After vNOTES Hysterectomy? A Comparative Observational Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
- Regional Anesthesia: A Narrative Review of Impact on Oxidative Stress Biomarkers.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Neuraxial anesthesia versus general anesthesia in patients undergoing three-dimensional laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Preliminary results of a prospective comparative study.Asian journal of urology · 2023Article
- Minimally invasive anesthesia for laparoscopic hysterectomy: a case series.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2022Article
- Laparoscopic gynecological surgery under minimally invasive anesthesia: a prospective cohort study.Updates in surgery · 2022Article
- Bilateral Salpingectomy for Sterilization: A Prospective Comparison of Laparoscopy and vNOTES.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare spinal anesthesia (SA) with general anesthesia (GA) in gynecologic laparoscopic surgery regarding anesthetic parameters and patient satisfaction together with an assessment of total oxidant, antioxidant levels, and Oxidative Stress index (OSI). MATERIALS AND
methodsSixty patients who were planned to undergo gynecologic laparoscopy were randomized into group G (GA) and group S (SA). Demographics, adverse events and anesthetic parameters were recorded before induction, after induction, and at the 5
resultsThere was no difference between the groups in terms of hemodynamic parameters except heart rate at 30
conclusionSA may become a reliable alternative to GA in gynecologic laparoscopy when hemodynamic and respiratory parameters, patient and surgeon satisfaction, as well as total oxidant, antioxidant levels, and OSI are considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.