ReviewJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
From injectable to 3D printed hydrogels in maxillofacial tissue engineering: A review.
Review in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Effectiveness and Complication Rate of Resorbable Biopolymers in Oral Surgery: A Systematic Review.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Mechanism of promoting the regeneration of oral tissues by injectable hydrogel.GMS hygiene and infection control · 2025Article
- Hydrogel Breakthroughs in Biomedicine: Recent Advances and Implications.Current pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2024Review
- Nanomaterials-incorporated hydrogels for 3D bioprinting technology.Nano convergence · 2023Review
- Advanced Hydrogel systems for mandibular reconstruction.Bioactive materials · 2023Review
- Nanomaterial-based biohybrid hydrogel in bioelectronics.Nano convergence · 2023Review
- Polymeric Nanocomposite Hydrogel Scaffolds in Craniofacial Bone Regeneration: A Comprehensive Review.Biomolecules · 2023Review
- Review
- Review
- Review
- Therapeutic application of hydrogels for bone-related diseases.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Vascularized bone regeneration accelerated by 3D-printed nanosilicate-functionalized polycaprolactone scaffold.Regenerative biomaterials · 2021Article
- Hydrogels and Their Role in Bone Tissue Engineering: An Overview.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2021Review
- Proposal for a Novel Abrasive Machining Method for Preparing the Surface of Periarticular Tissue during Orthopedic Surgery on Hip Joints.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2021Article
- Oral Bone Tissue Regeneration: Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Secretome, and Biomaterials.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Light and Hydrogels: A New Generation of Antimicrobial Materials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis review aims at describing different types of hydrogels in context to their composition, fabrication techniques and other specific features along with an insight into the latest advancements including smart hydrogels, 3D printed, programmable, shape memory and self-healing hydrogels for their applicability as scaffold in maxillofacial bone and cartilage tissue regeneration.
methodsElectronic database searches were undertaken on PubMed, Ovid, Medline, Embase, ProQuest and science direct for English language literature, published for application of hydrogels in maxillofacial bone and cartilage tissue engineering. The search items used in this article were hydrogel, bone and cartilage tissue engineering, maxillofacial, clinical trials. Reviews and in vitro studies were excluded.
resultsSearch for injectable hydrogel showed 4955 articles, when restricted to bone tissue engineering results were reduced to 463 and for cartilage engineering to 335; when we limited it to maxillofacial bone and cartilage tissue engineering, search results showed 49 articles to which 9 additional articles were included from references, after exclusion of in-vitro studies and duplicates 16 articles were obtained for our study. Similarly, for 3D printed hydrogels, result showed 1126 articles, which got restricted to 19 when searched for maxillofacial bone and cartilage engineering, then 2 additional articles were included directly from references, and finally after exclusion of the invitro studies and duplicates, a total of 5 articles were obtained.
conclusionModifications in hydrogel can improve the mechanical properties, biocompatibility and unique chemistries for its use in bone and cartilage tissue engineering for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.