Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33075106›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2020

A natural polymorphism of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the esxH gene disrupts immunodomination by the TB10.4-specific CD8 T cell response.

Rujapak Sutiwisesak, Nathan D Hicks, Shayla Boyce, Kenan C Murphy, Kadamba Papavinasasundaram, Stephen M Carpenter, Julie Boucau, Neelambari Joshi, Sylvie Le Gall, Sarah M Fortune and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. HowVaccines · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. CD226 identifies effector CD8Cell reports · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Heterogeneity in lung macrophage control ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. iScience · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Multiple genetic paths including massive gene amplification allowProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rujapak SutiwisesakImmunology and Microbiology Program, Graduate School of Biomedical Science, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9685-3662
Nathan D HicksDepartment of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6631-8383
Shayla BoyceDepartment of Microbiology and Physiological Systems, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Kenan C MurphyImmunology and Microbiology Program, Graduate School of Biomedical Science, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3677-2876
Kadamba PapavinasasundaramDepartment of Microbiology and Physiological Systems, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Stephen M CarpenterDepartment of Microbiology and Physiological Systems, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9879-327X
Julie BoucauRagon Institute of Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6731-7238
Neelambari JoshiRagon Institute of Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Sylvie Le GallRagon Institute of Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Sarah M FortuneDepartment of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Christopher M SassettiImmunology and Microbiology Program, Graduate School of Biomedical Science, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Samuel M BeharImmunology and Microbiology Program, Graduate School of Biomedical Science, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3374-6699
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USRagon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Systems Genetics of TuberculosisP01AI132130 · NIAID · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI BEHAR, SAMUEL M · 2017 to 2021
$11.2M
Regulation of CD8+ T cell immunity to tuberculosis (pending title)R01AI106725 · NIAID · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI BEHAR, SAMUEL M · 2013 to 2022
$6.1M
Tuberculosis and T cell RecognitionR01AI123286 · NIAID · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI BEHAR, SAMUEL M, FORTUNE, SARAH · 2016 to 2020
$3.5M
Focusing the vaccine-elicited T cell response on the recognition of Mtb-infected cellsR21AI136922 · NIAID · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI BEHAR, SAMUEL M · 2019 to 2020
$461k
NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI132130NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI106725NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI123286NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI136922
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CD8 T cells provide limited protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection in the mouse model. As Mtb causes chronic infection in mice and humans, we hypothesize that Mtb impairs T cell responses as an immune evasion strategy. TB10.4 is an immunodominant antigen in people, nonhuman primates, and mice, which is encoded by the esxH gene. In C57BL/6 mice, 30-50% of pulmonary CD8 T cells recognize the TB10.44-11 epitope. However, TB10.4-specific CD8 T cells fail to recognize Mtb-infected macrophages. We speculate that Mtb elicits immunodominant CD8 T cell responses to antigens that are inefficiently presented by infected cells, thereby focusing CD8 T cells on nonprotective antigens. Here, we leverage naturally occurring polymorphisms in esxH, which frequently occur in lineage 1 strains, to test this "decoy hypothesis". Using the clinical isolate 667, which contains an EsxHA10T polymorphism, we observe a drastic change in the hierarchy of CD8 T cells. Using isogenic Erd.EsxHA10T and Erd.EsxHWT strains, we prove that this polymorphism alters the hierarchy of immunodominant CD8 T cell responses. Our data are best explained by immunodomination, a mechanism by which competition for APC leads to dominant responses suppressing subdominant responses. These results were surprising as the variant epitope can bind to H2-Kb and is recognized by TB10.4-specific CD8 T cells. The dramatic change in TB10.4-specific CD8 responses resulted from increased proteolytic degradation of A10T variant, which destroyed the TB10.44-11epitope. Importantly, this polymorphism affected T cell priming and recognition of infected cells. These data support a model in which nonprotective CD8 T cells become immunodominant and suppress subdominant responses. Thus, polymorphisms between clinical Mtb strains, and BCG or H37Rv sequence-based vaccines could lead to a mismatch between T cells that are primed by vaccines and the epitopes presented by infected cells. Reprograming host immune responses should be considered in the future design of vaccines.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, BacterialCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHumansMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosisAntigens, BacterialEpitopes, T-LymphocyteTB10.4 antigen, Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID33075106
PMCPMC7597557
OpenAlexW3093241131

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.