Evidence mapPaperPMID 33090268Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2021

A population-based comparison of treatment, resource utilization, and costs by cancer stage for Ontario patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.

Christine Brezden-Masley, Kelly E Fathers, Megan E Coombes, Behin Pourmirza, Cloris Xue, Katarzyna J Jerzak

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christine Brezden-MasleyDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kelly E FathersDepartment of Medical Affairs, Hoffmann-La Roche Limited, Mississauga, ON, Canada.
Megan E CoombesMarket Access and Pricing Department, Hoffmann-La Roche Limited, Mississauga, ON, Canada.
Behin PourmirzaDepartment of Medical Affairs, Hoffmann-La Roche Limited, Mississauga, ON, Canada.
Cloris XueDepartment of Medical Affairs, Hoffmann-La Roche Limited, Mississauga, ON, Canada.
Katarzyna J JerzakDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. katarzyna.jerzak@sunnybrook.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3995-0308
Roche (Canada) · CAMount Sinai Hospital · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe sought to expand the currently limited, Canadian, population-based data on the characteristics, treatment pathways, and health care costs according to stage in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 positive (HER2+) breast cancer (BC).

methodsWe extracted data from the publicly funded health care system in Ontario. Baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, and health care costs were descriptively compared by cancer stage (I-III vs. IV) for adult women diagnosed with invasive HER2+ BC between 2012 and 2016. Resource use was multiplied by unit costs for publicly funded health care services to calculate costs.

resultsOverall, 4535 patients with stage I-III and 354 with stage IV HER2+ BC were identified. Most patients with stage I-III disease were treated with surgery (4372, 96.4%), with the majority having a lumpectomy, and 3521 (77.6%) received radiation. Neoadjuvant (NAT) and adjuvant (AT) systemic treatment rates were 20.1% (n = 920) and 88.8% (n = 3065), respectively. Systemic treatment was received by 311 patients (87.9%) with metastatic HER2+ BC, 264 of whom (84.9%) received trastuzumab. Annual health care costs per patient were nearly 3 times higher for stage IV vs. stage I-III HER2+ BC.

conclusionPer-patient annual costs were substantially higher for women with metastatic HER2+ BC, despite less frequent exposure to surgery and radiation compared to those with early stage disease. Increasing NAT rates in early stage disease represent a critical opportunity to prevent recurrence and reduce the costs associated with treating metastatic HER2+ BC.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAdultErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOntarioTrastuzumabErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesTrastuzumabBreast neoplasmsDrug therapyEpidemiologic studiesHealth expendituresHealth services researchReceptor ErbB-2

Identifiers

PMID33090268
PMCPMC7921035
OpenAlexW3093782821

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.