Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33092269›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Aging at Work: A Review of Recent Trends and Future Directions.

Jasmina Barakovic Husic, Francisco José Melero, Sabina Barakovic, Petre Lameski, Eftim Zdravevski, Petra Maresova, Ondrej Krejcar, Ivan Chorbev, Nuno M Garcia, Vladimir Trajkovik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. A Case Study of Ergonomic Risk Assessment in Slovakia with Respect to EU Standard.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jasmina Barakovic HusicDepartment of Telecommunications, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Sarajevo, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.ORCID 0000-0001-6119-6447
Francisco José MeleroTechnological Centre of Furniture and Wood of the Region of Murcia (CETEM), C/Perales S/N, 30510 Yecla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2108-5018
Sabina BarakovicLittle Mama Labs, Gradacacka 29, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.ORCID 0000-0001-8121-9765
Petre LameskiFaculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Ss Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, 1000 Skopje, North Macedonia.ORCID 0000-0002-5336-1796
Eftim ZdravevskiFaculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Ss Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, 1000 Skopje, North Macedonia.ORCID 0000-0001-7664-0168
Petra MaresovaFaculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Kralove, 500 03 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-1093-9420
Ondrej KrejcarFaculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Kralove, 500 03 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-5992-2574
Ivan ChorbevFaculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Ss Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, 1000 Skopje, North Macedonia.ORCID 0000-0002-9648-4438
Nuno M GarciaInstituto de Telecomunicações, Universidade da Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3195-3168
Vladimir TrajkovikFaculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Ss Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, 1000 Skopje, North Macedonia.ORCID 0000-0001-8103-8059

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Demographic data suggest a rapid aging trend in the active workforce. The concept of aging at work comes from the urgent requirement to help the aging workforce of the contemporary industries to maintain productivity while achieving a work and private life balance. While there is plenty of research focusing on the aging population, current research activities on policies covering the concept of aging at work are limited and conceptually different. This paper aims to review publications on aging at work, which could lead to the creation of a framework that targets governmental decision-makers, the non-governmental sector, the private sector, and all of those who are responsible for the formulation of policies on aging at work. In August 2019 we searched for peer-reviewed articles in English that were indexed in PubMed, IEEE Xplore, and Springer and published between 2008 and 2019. The keywords included the following phrases: "successful aging at work", "active aging at work", "healthy aging at work", "productive aging at work", and "older adults at work". A total of 47,330 publications were found through database searching, and 25,187 publications were screened. Afterwards, 7756 screened publications were excluded from the further analysis, and a total of 17,431 article abstracts were evaluated for inclusion. Finally, further qualitative analysis included 1375 articles, of which about 24 are discussed in this article. The most prominent works suggest policies that encourage life-long learning, and a workforce that comprises both younger and older workers, as well as gradual retirement.

Indexed as

AgingHealthy AgingRetirementAgedHumansaging at workassistancedeficitdiscriminationgrowthlegislationpolicy

Identifiers

PMID33092269
PMCPMC7589844

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.