Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33099304›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2020

Liver resection for colorectal liver-limited metastases in elderly patients: a propensity score matching analysis.

Ke-Min Jin, Kun Wang, Quan Bao, Hong-Wei Wang, Bao-Cai Xing

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ke-Min JinKey laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit I, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52, Fu Cheng Road, Beijing, 100142, People's Republic of China.
Kun WangKey laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit I, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52, Fu Cheng Road, Beijing, 100142, People's Republic of China.
Quan BaoKey laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit I, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52, Fu Cheng Road, Beijing, 100142, People's Republic of China.
Hong-Wei WangKey laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit I, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52, Fu Cheng Road, Beijing, 100142, People's Republic of China.
Bao-Cai XingKey laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit I, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52, Fu Cheng Road, Beijing, 100142, People's Republic of China. xingbaocai88@sina.com.
Peking University · CNPeking University Cancer Hospital · CN

Funding

National Key Basic Research Development Program of China 2014CBA02001National Natural Science Foundation of China 31971192National Natural Science Foundation of China 81874143Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality 7192035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew studies have focused on the role of hepatectomy for colorectal liver-limited metastases in elderly patients compared to matched younger patients.

methodsFrom January 2000 to December 2018, 724 patients underwent hepatectomy for colorectal liver-limited metastases. Based on a 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM) model, 64 elderly patients (≥ 70 years of age) were matched to 128 younger patients (< 70 years of age) to obtain two balanced groups with regard to demographic, therapeutic, and prognostic factors.

resultsThere were 73 elderly and 651 younger patients in the unmatched cohort. Compared with the younger group (YG), the elderly group (EG) had significantly higher proportion of American Society of Anesthesiologists score III and comorbidities and lower proportion of more than 3 liver metastases and postoperative chemotherapy (p < 0.05). After PSM for these factors, rat sarcoma virus proto-oncogene/B-Raf proto-oncogene (RAS/BRAF) mutation status and primary tumor sidedness, the EG had significantly less median intraoperative blood loss than the YG (175 ml vs. 200 ml, p = 0.046), a shorter median postoperative hospital stay (8 days vs. 11 days, p = 0.020), and a higher readmission rate (4.7% vs.0%, p = 0.036). The EG also had longer disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) compared to the YG, but these findings were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Old age was not an independent factor for DFS, OS, and CSS by Cox multivariate regression analysis (p > 0.05).

conclusionsHepatectomy is safe for colorectal liver-limited metastases in elderly patients, and these patients may subsequently benefit from prolonged DFS, OS, and CSS.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsAgedDisease-Free SurvivalHepatectomyHumansPrognosisPropensity ScoreProto-Oncogene MasRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeProto-Oncogene MasColorectal cancerElderlyHepatectomyLiver-limited metastasesSurvival

Identifiers

PMID33099304
PMCPMC7585677
OpenAlexW3094131830

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.